User talk:Awesomecat: Difference between revisions

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by ClueBot III.

I noticed that you removed your draft’s DISPLAYTITLE after unsuccessfully attempting to use {{ititle}} as a magic word. Could you explain your rationale? Paradoctor (talk) 01:30, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was already italicized by the infobox I added. — Awesomecat / ✉ / ✎ / 01:34, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. Paradoctor (talk) 01:45, 25 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by GoldRomean were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Current sources are all from laundry net companies looking to sell their own products, which is unideal.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

GoldRomean (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Awesomecat713! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 20:28, 1 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Awesomecat713. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page’s latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional “status” on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you’re not sure about something, ask!

I’m sure you’ll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I’ll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators’ guide/Rollback (even though you’re not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! — Newslinger talk 15:59, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Volten001 Thanks so much! I appreciate all you’re doing, spreading love on Wikipedia. Awesomecat (✉ / ✎) 16:54, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome, Awesomecat. Thanks also for the compliment. Nice time! Volten001 ^☎ 17:19, 24 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

(This message was sent to User talk:Awesomecat713 and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

Hello, I’m ~2026-63754-9, and welcome to Wikipedia. I appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Ibrahim (Ottoman sultan), it appears that you added original research, which is against Wikipedia’s policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. ~2026-63754-9 (talk) 08:37, 30 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]