User talk:AzharHussain369: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 29: Line 29:

| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]

| image = [[File:Sock block.svg|55px]]

| text=”””’This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely””’ as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]]&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|”illegitimate”]] reasons ”’is not”’, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!– Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. –><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)<!– Template:SockBlock –>}}

| text=”””’This account has been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] indefinitely””’ as a [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry|sockpuppet]]&#32;that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Legitimate uses|allowed]], but using them for [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry#Inappropriate uses of alternative accounts|”illegitimate”]] reasons ”’is not”’, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Evasion of blocks|may be reverted or deleted]]. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may [[Wikipedia:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the text <!– Copy the text as it appears on the page, not as it appears in this edit area. –><code><nowiki>{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> below. [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 09:17, 5 October 2025 (UTC)<!– Template:SockBlock –>}}

:please help me brohter, its my first time publihsing my very first article

:{{unblock|Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)}} [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)

:brother why?? please help me am just trying to publish my first article

:brother why?? please help me am just trying to publish my first article


Latest revision as of 09:23, 5 October 2025

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

Not fully convinced on this person meeting WP:NMUSIC. We have some interviews and promo-pieces as sources, neither of which are independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

qcne (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AzharHussain369!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 15:57, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

please help me brohter, its my first time publihsing my very first article

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AzharHussain369 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

AzharHussain369 (talk) 09:23, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

brother why?? please help me am just trying to publish my first article

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

AzharHussain369 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:20, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:20, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:AzharHussain369|AzharHussain369]] ([[User talk:AzharHussain369#top|talk]]) 09:20, 5 October 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

AzharHussain369 (talk) 09:20, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version