User talk:Bahatteadel1351: Difference between revisions

Hello, Bahatteadel1351, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Wildlife of Algeria did not conform to Wikipedia’s verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  UtherSRG (talk) 22:20, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wildlife of Algeria. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 23:50, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wildlife of Algeria. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 13:44, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wildlife of Algeria. UtherSRG (talk) 14:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Bahatteadel1351: your edits have already been reverted multiple times. Why do you keep on re-adding taxa that are not native to Algeria and risk being blocked ? – BhagyaMani (talk) 15:04, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Bahatteadel1351 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=i cant edit [[User:Bahatteadel1351|Bahatteadel1351]] ([[User talk:Bahatteadel1351#top|talk]]) 08:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=i cant edit [[User:Bahatteadel1351|Bahatteadel1351]] ([[User talk:Bahatteadel1351#top|talk]]) 08:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=i cant edit [[User:Bahatteadel1351|Bahatteadel1351]] ([[User talk:Bahatteadel1351#top|talk]]) 08:24, 10 October 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}