User talk:ButterflyCat – Wikipedia

Hi, Lars Knudsen redirects to the Danish researcher, not to Lars Knudsen (producer). I think the disambiguation note you posted on the film producer’s article is incorrect. Furthermore, I think Lars Knudsen should be a disambiguation page because there’s no primary topic. ~2026-84250-4 (talk) 11:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that Lars Knudsen should be a disambiguation page since there’s no clear primary topic. You will need to wait for a page mover or admin to handle the disambiguation and redirects issues.. ButterflyCat (talk) 11:58, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the appropriate place to raise this request so it can be addressed? ~2026-84250-4 (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This can be raised at WP:RM (Requested Moves) or WP:RFD (Redirects for Discussion). Since it involves deciding whether Lars Knudsen should be a disambiguation page and adjusting redirects, a page mover or admin there can handle it. ButterflyCat (talk) 12:19, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others’ comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 20:01, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for that. I understand discussion pages should not be edited, and I’ll avoid doing so in the future. I am learning slowly slowly Wikipedia system ButterflyCat (talk) 20:05, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Irrelevant comments are often hatted. I haven’t checked if that is appropriate in this case. Phil Bridger (talk) 20:49, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i noted ✔️ ButterflyCat (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kotdwar shop name controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kotdwar shop name controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

harrz ^talk 01:17, 8 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]