User talk:Caleb22022: Difference between revisions

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!– Template:Db-draft-deleted –><!– Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom –> <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 17:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!– Template:Db-draft-deleted –><!– Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom –> <span style=”font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;”>[[User:Liz|””’L””’iz]]</span> <sup style=”font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;”>[[Special:Contributions/Liz|””’Read!””’]] [[User talk:Liz|””’Talk!””’]]</sup> 17:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

== November 2025 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Graywalls|Graywalls]]. An edit that you recently made to [[:Google Search Console]] seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:Caleb22022/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Graywalls|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:Graywalls|Graywalls]] ([[User talk:Graywalls|talk]]) 17:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Kuru. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Google Ads have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 16:40, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I will take it into consideration in the future. Caleb22022 (talk) 22:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Chaotic Enby were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Caleb22022! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:13, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBritinator was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

TheBritinator (talk) 14:04, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anuwrites was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Musicbrainz is an open music encyclopedia, means, anyone can edit and add info into it, thus cannot be accepted as a reliable source here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

ANU^writes 00:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on DJ Retain, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CarlosEduardoPA (talk) 18:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I noted your comment on the talk page of the deleted article. However, while it’s normally my practice to respond to such comments, you used a chatbot to write that, and I’m not interested in talking to bots. Going forward, when you engage in discussion with other editors, please use your own words and do not use chatbots. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:38, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also, it looks like you used chatbots to generate at least substantial portions of the article content. Please don’t do that, either. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Caleb22022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bricks Builder, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:07, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Caleb22022. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Caleb22022/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:08, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Caleb22022. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “sandbox“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:40, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Graywalls. An edit that you recently made to Google Search Console seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Graywalls (talk) 17:46, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]