User talk:Callanecc: Difference between revisions

Callanecc is busy and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If I left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If it was a warning or other notice please ping me so I know to look. If you leave me a message: I will answer on this talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages is appreciated.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is a kind notification that I’ve requested removal of your user page’s protection at WP:RPP#User:Callanecc. The protecting admin is you, but I see you last edited 20 July 2025, so I thought it would be futile me leaving a message here as there are also big notices saying you’re busy 🙈 and I’d likely forget. I hope you don’t mind me taking it to WP:RPP ‘first’. waddie96 ★ (talk) 15:33, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why on Earth does it matter if a user page is protected? And if it did, it’s hardly such an emergency that it can’t be discussed with the user the page belongs to simply because they’ve been inactive for a few weeks. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:42, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not an emergency I didn’t mean to startle you? waddie96 ★ (talk) 22:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What I mean to say is , I would’ve forgotten, so just sort it now? It’s not like I’m reporting someone to police; it’s an admin/maintenance thing. Thanks for your understanding waddie96 ★ (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Back in 2020, you closed out the SPI for NC-2017 with the summary “I’ve blocked the sock, but left the master unblocked as there are some good edits.”

Since then, your forbearance has been rewarded with them editing exclusively about their company, and now recreating the barely sub-G4 autobio Rowan Winch. What are your thoughts? Thanks, Wikishovel (talk) 09:44, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wikishovel, I’ve left them a modified welcome template with some information on editing with a COI. I wouldn’t say that they’re causing any real harm at the moment so my advice would be that it’s just about keeping an eye on them and supporting them to understand our requirements around sourcing and COIs. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 13:06, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent CU block for Fittu123 (talk · contribs · block log), can you confirm if Template:Uw-lockedorindefinitlyblockedonenglishwikipedia is G5 eligible? I was about to bring it to TfD but it’d make things easier if it can just be nuked right away. Perryprog (talk) 03:40, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is and I’ve deleted it. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:28, 11 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Ignore all rules on a “Wikipedia policies and guidelines” request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you’d like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

(replacing Yapperbot) SodiumBot (botop|talk) 10:31, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the logged warning you posted on my tp, I need a bit assistance on what exactly is battleground behaviour. Example, most of my edits were reverting ip´s who were vandalising certain pages. Usually I would report them on official pages. Is that also battleground behaviour? Should I just let go and let that someone else reverts them even though it may pass 2 or 3 weeks? Thank you.Theonewithreason (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]