[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Yuvaank|Yuvaank]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:Caped CrusaderK/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Yuvaank|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:Yuvaank|Yuvaank]] ([[User talk:Yuvaank|talk]]) 20:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Yuvaank|Yuvaank]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:Caped CrusaderK/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:Yuvaank|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:Yuvaank|Yuvaank]] ([[User talk:Yuvaank|talk]]) 20:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
:Hello [[User:Yuvaank|Yuvaank]],
:Thanks for the note. I understand the concerns around large language models. However, I would like to clarify that Wikipedia does not prohibit the use of drafting tools; content is evaluated based on accuracy, attribution, and compliance with [[WP:RS]], [[WP:NPOV]], and [[WP:V]].
:The material in question was written by synthesising information from reliable, mainstream news sources, with all evaluative language explicitly attributed to those sources. If there are specific statements, citations, or phrasings that you believe violate policy (for example, undue weight, synthesis, or attribution issues), I would appreciate it if you could point them out so they can be addressed directly.
:You cannot assume a policy violation just because the text appears to be automated. Any concerns should be grounded in identifiable policy issues within the content itself, not assumptions about how the text was produced.
:Assessments should focus on verifiable policy issues within the content itself, rather than assumptions about how the text was produced.
:Still, if any specific sentences need rewording or clarification to better align with Wikipedia’s standards, I am open to making those adjustments. My goal is to ensure that the content is accurate, verifiable, and presented neutrally, while maintaining the integrity of the sourced information. [[User:Caped CrusaderK|Caped CrusaderK]] ([[User talk:Caped CrusaderK#top|talk]]) 08:09, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shemai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eid. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 21 October 2025 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khwaja Salimullah, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English and Persian.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 30 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m X2step. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Beguni, but you didn’t provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. x2step (lets talk 💌) 19:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bichnakandi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cluster.
(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 13 December 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from hijacking pages, as you did with Ali Amjad Khan. Should you believe the subject you were writing about deserves an article, please use the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version that you can then get feedback on. Please also see Wikipedia’s disambiguation guideline which indicates how to handle separate subjects with similar names. If you continue to hijack an existing article, you may be blocked from editing. If you have any questions, you are always welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Alivardi (talk) 19:31, 29 December 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I’m Yuvaank. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yuvaank (talk) 20:58, 3 January 2026 (UTC)
- Hello Yuvaank,
- Thanks for the note. I understand the concerns around large language models. However, I would like to clarify that Wikipedia does not prohibit the use of drafting tools; content is evaluated based on accuracy, attribution, and compliance with WP:RS, WP:NPOV, and WP:V.
- The material in question was written by synthesising information from reliable, mainstream news sources, with all evaluative language explicitly attributed to those sources. If there are specific statements, citations, or phrasings that you believe violate policy (for example, undue weight, synthesis, or attribution issues), I would appreciate it if you could point them out so they can be addressed directly.
- You cannot assume a policy violation just because the text appears to be automated. Any concerns should be grounded in identifiable policy issues within the content itself, not assumptions about how the text was produced.
- Assessments should focus on verifiable policy issues within the content itself, rather than assumptions about how the text was produced.
- Still, if any specific sentences need rewording or clarification to better align with Wikipedia’s standards, I am open to making those adjustments. My goal is to ensure that the content is accurate, verifiable, and presented neutrally, while maintaining the integrity of the sourced information. Caped CrusaderK (talk) 08:09, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
