User talk:CapPixel: Difference between revisions

 

Line 85: Line 85:

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!– Template:Proposed deletion notify –> [[User:Coeusin|Coeusin]] ([[User talk:Coeusin|talk]]) 17:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!– Template:Proposed deletion notify –> [[User:Coeusin|Coeusin]] ([[User talk:Coeusin|talk]]) 17:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)

== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:ADC Ars et Labor Grottaglie]] ==

[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:ADC Ars et Labor Grottaglie]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:

<blockquote>”’No significant coverage of the football club in independent reliable sources to establish [[WP:N|notability]]. Found event, and player mentions, but no in-depth content.”'</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:ADC Ars et Labor Grottaglie|the article’s talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!– Template:Proposed deletion notify –> [[User:JoeNMLC|JoeNMLC]] ([[User talk:JoeNMLC|talk]]) 19:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Modica Calcio logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 17:39, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article AC Calenzano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage of the club
in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Found mentions, but no in-depth content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:37, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article USD Città di Fasano has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage of the football club in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Found match results, player transfers, and other mentions, but no in-depth content about the club.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 18:46, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AC Horatiana Venosa ASD is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AC Horatiana Venosa ASD until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

WhoIsCentreLeft (talk) 18:04, 10 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:San Marino Calcio logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 02:34, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2025 October 3 § Category:Churches in the Marche by city on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 12:28, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:US Castelnuovo Garfagnana logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 17:37, 4 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Football clubs in Piedmont and Aosta Valley has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category’s entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 16:52, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ostuni Calcio 24 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Semi-pro team, never reached above 4th tier. Coverage in sources seems to be just local sports coverage and not anything that establishes it meeting GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 14:52, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ostuni Calcio 24 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ostuni Calcio 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CountryANDWestern (talk) 23:54, 28 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article Basame el cueo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:NALBUM, unreferenced since creation nearly 20 years ago

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Coeusin (talk) 17:05, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article ADC Ars et Labor Grottaglie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No significant coverage of the football club in independent reliable sources to establish notability. Found event, and player mentions, but no in-depth content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:30, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version