User talk:Cardinal Number: Difference between revisions

 

Line 66: Line 66:

::Hi @[[User:Cardinal Number|Cardinal Number]], I admit that several of the updates that I reverted do not show obvious [[WP:AISIGNS|signs]] of having been LLM-generated. But some of them do, especially [[Special:Diff/1321285275|this]], which includes the following sentence: {{tqq|The literary tradition of Urdu, which began in the Deccan region in the 14th century and later centered in Delhi and Lucknow, is known for its blend of Indic and Persianate cultural influences. It gained prominence through the works of major figures like Mir Taqi Mir, Ghalib, and Muhammad Iqbal.}} This is top-tier LLM-style stuff, and combined with the high-frequency nature of your edits, makes me convinced that you ”’did”’ use LLMs for at least some of these article expansions. [[User:NicheSports|NicheSports]] ([[User talk:NicheSports|talk]]) 23:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

::Hi @[[User:Cardinal Number|Cardinal Number]], I admit that several of the updates that I reverted do not show obvious [[WP:AISIGNS|signs]] of having been LLM-generated. But some of them do, especially [[Special:Diff/1321285275|this]], which includes the following sentence: {{tqq|The literary tradition of Urdu, which began in the Deccan region in the 14th century and later centered in Delhi and Lucknow, is known for its blend of Indic and Persianate cultural influences. It gained prominence through the works of major figures like Mir Taqi Mir, Ghalib, and Muhammad Iqbal.}} This is top-tier LLM-style stuff, and combined with the high-frequency nature of your edits, makes me convinced that you ”’did”’ use LLMs for at least some of these article expansions. [[User:NicheSports|NicheSports]] ([[User talk:NicheSports|talk]]) 23:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

:::As long as you stop this style of editing this is all academic as I am not an admin and I’m not going to report a user for a few article expansions, especially those without meeting more tangible criteria for identifying LLMs such as the [[WP:G15]] criteria or having multiple source-to-text integrity issues. I will note though that other users have flagged your edits for puffery – see the edit summary at [[Special:Diff/1321110912]] for an example – so whatever you are doing, you should be careful to avoid LLM-style edits in the future. Thanks [[User:NicheSports|NicheSports]] ([[User talk:NicheSports|talk]]) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

:::As long as you stop this style of editing this is all academic as I am not an admin and I’m not going to report a user for a few article expansions, especially those without meeting more tangible criteria for identifying LLMs such as the [[WP:G15]] criteria or having multiple source-to-text integrity issues. I will note though that other users have flagged your edits for puffery – see the edit summary at [[Special:Diff/1321110912]] for an example – so whatever you are doing, you should be careful to avoid LLM-style edits in the future. Thanks [[User:NicheSports|NicheSports]] ([[User talk:NicheSports|talk]]) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

::::Of course. [[User:Cardinal Number|Cardinal Number]] ([[User talk:Cardinal Number#top|talk]]) 01:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi Cardinal Number! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 23:45, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kasai Rex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kasai rex. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wikishovel (talk) 10:59, 5 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Cardinal Number, Explicit, and Chanel Dsouza: Cardinal Number – I suggest you have a look at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornitos. I can see that a lot of the text in the 8 Nov 2025 version of this article is very similar to the version created 30 Aug 2024 and deleted 3 March 2025. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:24, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Cornitos, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Cornitos. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and sources should be reliable and independent and significant coverage of the subject.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:40, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:48, 8 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Arcola Elementary School, Maryland has been moved to Draft:Arcola Elementary School, Maryland because it did not yet include independent, reliable sources showing that the topic meets Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for schools. The draftspace allows you to continue improving it without risk of deletion.

You can expand the draft by adding references from news articles, books, or other reliable, independent sources that provide significant coverage of the school. Once the article is well-sourced and ready, it can be reviewed for return to the main encyclopedia.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Acrom12 (talk) 03:17, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit history shows you are using LLMs to make high frequency expansions to existing articles. Can you please stop this right away? NicheSports (talk) 22:40, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for anything I might have caused, but I did not actually use any LLM or AI tool to expand articles. I don’t actually have access to them anyways and have a moral code against utilizing them in any situation. If you are reacting to the small time intervals between my expansions, I sometimes enjoy scrolling through Category:Wikipedia introduction cleanup and writing improvements down on Google Docs when I can’t edit Wikipedia at the moment. I copy and pasted multiple paragraphs I wrote into the articles. I do realize that I didn’t cite my sources, so forgive me for that; I will correct myself in the future. Again, I apologize for any inconvenience I might have caused. Cardinal Number (talk) 23:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Cardinal Number, I admit that several of the updates that I reverted do not show obvious signs of having been LLM-generated. But some of them do, especially this, which includes the following sentence: The literary tradition of Urdu, which began in the Deccan region in the 14th century and later centered in Delhi and Lucknow, is known for its blend of Indic and Persianate cultural influences. It gained prominence through the works of major figures like Mir Taqi Mir, Ghalib, and Muhammad Iqbal. This is top-tier LLM-style stuff, and combined with the high-frequency nature of your edits, makes me convinced that you did use LLMs for at least some of these article expansions. NicheSports (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you stop this style of editing this is all academic as I am not an admin and I’m not going to report a user for a few article expansions, especially those without meeting more tangible criteria for identifying LLMs such as the WP:G15 criteria or having multiple source-to-text integrity issues. I will note though that other users have flagged your edits for puffery – see the edit summary at Special:Diff/1321110912 for an example – so whatever you are doing, you should be careful to avoid LLM-style edits in the future. Thanks NicheSports (talk) 23:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Of course. Cardinal Number (talk) 01:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]