From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
|
|||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
|
::Or [https://www.decanter.com/spirits/mizunara-oak-explained-526736/ this one] ?? Both may be a bit borderline.[[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
::Or [https://www.decanter.com/spirits/mizunara-oak-explained-526736/ this one] ?? Both may be a bit borderline.[[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap#top|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
:::The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap#top|talk]]) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::::OK, tyvm. [[User:MisawaSakura|MisawaSakura]] ([[User talk:MisawaSakura|talk]]) 17:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 17:15, 26 October 2025
- Archives
2006 –11 –
2012 –
2013 –
2014 –
2015 –
2016 –
2017 –
2018 –
2019 –
2020 –
2021 –
2022 –
2023 –
2024 –
2025 –
Your good article nomination of the article William Morris’s influence on Tolkien is
I’m working on Quercus crispula now. The wood is highley prized for whiskey barrels. Would you consider this a reliable source? MisawaSakura (talk) 16:43, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
-
- Or this one ?? Both may be a bit borderline.MisawaSakura (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- OK, tyvm. MisawaSakura (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- The first one is certainly too commercial; the second one is enough like a magazine that I guess it’s ok (after all, all newspapers and magazines have a commercial aspect). Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
- Or this one ?? Both may be a bit borderline.MisawaSakura (talk) 16:49, 26 October 2025 (UTC)
