User talk:ChitoCastillo1234: Difference between revisions

Line 108: Line 108:

== Notice of Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents discussion ==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.<!–Template:Discussion notice–><!–Template:ANI-notice–> [[User:Blue-Sonnet|Blue Sonnet]] ([[User talk:Blue-Sonnet|talk]]) 14:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

== Don’t use talk pages as draft pages ==

Please don’t do this[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk%3AThe_Master_Cutter&diff=1336337215&oldid=1336336126] again. [[User:Hotwiki|Hotwiki]] ([[User talk:Hotwiki|talk]]) 14:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Arcrev1. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kim Rodriguez, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Arcrev1 (talk) 11:20, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Blood vs Duty Love Is Never Gone Hari ng Tondo Apoy sa Dugo The Master Cutter (2026 TV series) ChitoCastillo1234 (talk) 04:48, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

ChitoCastillo1234 (talk) 04:50, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Never Say Die (2025 TV series). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Patre23 (talk) 03:59, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Unreferenced. Zero evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ChitoCastillo1234!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:38, 30 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pointless resubmission of unsourced article

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:21, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ChitoCastillo1234! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like you’ve ignored that message about minor edits. Please stop misusing the minor edit box, or you would be reported alongside your unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 15:04, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Hotwiki. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, House of Lies (Philippine TV series), but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hotwiki (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to House of Lies (Philippine TV series) did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Describe what you changed

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Hotwiki (talk) 15:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at House of Lies (Philippine TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Hotwiki (talk) 15:02, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at House of Lies (Philippine TV series). Hotwiki (talk) 14:24, 20 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is ChitoCastillo1234 misuse of the minor edit box and unreferenced edits. Hotwiki (talk) 03:26, 21 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from article space for persistent lack of communication, see the warnings above. Please respond constructively below this notice and you will probably be unblocked. Bishonen | tålk 13:41, 22 January 2026 (UTC).[reply]

@ChitoCastillo1234 can you please stop adding links to your drafts to random places and please discuss your block here?

It’s also not appropriate to cut and paste edits directly into Talk pages – I’m not sure what you’ve done with “The Master Cutter”, the Talk page you’ve created links to a different article and I’m not even sure how to fix that.

Please stop editing and reply here, or make properly formatted WP:Edit requests to existing Talk pages. Blue Sonnet (talk) 07:04, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Blue Sonnet (talk) 14:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t do this[1] again. Hotwiki (talk) 14:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply