From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
|
 |
|||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
|
:Hi, so what can count as a secondary source? Are newpaper articles sufficient? [[Special:Contributions/~2025-33970-62|~2025-33970-62]] ([[User talk:~2025-33970-62|talk]]) 23:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC) |
:Hi, so what can count as a secondary source? Are newpaper articles sufficient? [[Special:Contributions/~2025-33970-62|~2025-33970-62]] ([[User talk:~2025-33970-62|talk]]) 23:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::Almost always. Feel free to send them here and I can verify this for you. [[User:Aesurias|aesurias]] ([[User talk:Aesurias|talk]]) 00:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC) |
::Almost always. Feel free to send them here and I can verify this for you. [[User:Aesurias|aesurias]] ([[User talk:Aesurias|talk]]) 00:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
:::https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/mendaki-to-train-its-tutors-as-mentors-integrate-tech-into-tuition-curriculum |
|||
|
:::https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/programme-launched-for-primary-school-pupils-to-pay-using-smartwatches-manage-their |
|||
|
:::Are these significant enough? [[User:Confused cantaloupe|Confused cantaloupe]] ([[User talk:Confused cantaloupe#top|talk]]) 02:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC) |
|||
|
{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;” |
{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;” |
||
Latest revision as of 02:09, 16 November 2025
Hi Confused cantaloupe! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tankishguy 22:26, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Aesurias were:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- Hi, so what can count as a secondary source? Are newpaper articles sufficient? ~2025-33970-62 (talk) 23:59, 15 November 2025 (UTC)
- Almost always. Feel free to send them here and I can verify this for you. aesurias (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/parenting-education/mendaki-to-train-its-tutors-as-mentors-integrate-tech-into-tuition-curriculum
- https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/programme-launched-for-primary-school-pupils-to-pay-using-smartwatches-manage-their
- Are these significant enough? Confused cantaloupe (talk) 02:09, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
- Almost always. Feel free to send them here and I can verify this for you. aesurias (talk) 00:50, 16 November 2025 (UTC)
|
Hello, Confused cantaloupe!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! aesurias (talk) 23:50, 15 November 2025 (UTC) |




