Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!– Template:Afd notice –></div> 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#800″>Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#070″>Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:59, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!– Template:Afd notice –></div> 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#800″>Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#070″>Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 17:59, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
== October 2025 ==
[[File:Information orange.svg|left|25px|alt=Information icon]] As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to [[:Joseph Boam]], give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|mandatory paid editing disclosure]] requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the ”’mandatory requirements under the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation.”’ Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at [[User:DanielAdams75]], and the template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=DanielAdams75|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. Please ”’respond before making any other edits”’ to Wikipedia. <!– Template:Uw-paid2 –> 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 [[User:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#800″>Fiddle</span><sup><small>Timtrent</small></sup>]] [[User talk:Timtrent|<span style=”color:#070″>Faddle</span><sup><small>Talk to me</small></sup>]] 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 18:03, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Hello DanielAdams75. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Joseph Boam, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:DanielAdams75. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DanielAdams75|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy’s edits 14:46, 19 September 2025 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Boam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Boam (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 17:59, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
As previously advised, your edits, such as the edit you made to Joseph Boam, give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:DanielAdams75, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=DanielAdams75|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 18:03, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

