User talk:DesignationJazz07: Difference between revisions

Hello, DesignationJazz07, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:41, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:06, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the passenger count that has the source already attached to the table. Thank you. DesignationJazz07 (talk) 20:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And as I said in the edit summary, that source is dated May 2025 – so how can it verify content from September and beyond? Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:12, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Its automatic, the BTS website automatically updates the numbers and the source already attached, is already conveniently there. DesignationJazz07 (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See right now if you look at that source, it has a very clear date of May 2025. If you’re saying it’s been updated, then that date must be updated, because it’s no longer “as of May 2025” – it’s now as of a new date. What you were doing initially is adding content from August using a source that’s listed as being from May. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:16, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I fixed it. Someone had added the wrong source directly to the wiki page specifically for BTS which that didn’t even have the correct information ironically. But it all better now. Thank you for your attention to this matter. DesignationJazz07 (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Except you still haven’t updated the date and have in fact broken the citation by removing the “cite web”. I’d recommend please having a read of WP:Referencing for beginners – I mean this in the spirit of working together as a community. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 20:22, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip. I’ll get on it DesignationJazz07 (talk) 20:24, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@DesignationJazz07 you’ve done the same thing again at Blue Grass Airport – if you’re reusing an existing citation, you must update the access date of that source to show that it has updated. Danners430 _{tweaks made} 21:11, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!!! DesignationJazz07 (talk) 21:25, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I’ve noticed you added a few missing Allegiant flights. For the sources on them, I noticed a lot of them are a few years old, but the date you put in the source is today’s date. That would only be the access date, the date line is for the date the source was written. Keep this in mind. Thank you! VenFlyer98 (talk) 19:26, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I see what you are saying. I was struggling to find an article that showcase the route resumption. The only sources I could find were when they originally started but I presume they had left and then came back. It’s confusing I know. The main I was trying to do was show by adding todays date that the flight does still exist. I hope that made sense. I am also struggling because I see many routes that aren’t offered through the website but there is not “announcement” type source to remove them. Do we just keep those listed routes as is in the table for now? Thank you in advance for your help. DesignationJazz07 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty much. However, the date field is for the date of the source. That’s all I’m trying to say. Using an older source like that is fine, just please make sure the date is correct. VenFlyer98 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]