:Given the above, I respectfully request that the block be lifted or replaced with a more limited editing restriction if necessary. I believe the block has served its purpose, and I am ready to edit responsibly.
:Given the above, I respectfully request that the block be lifted or replaced with a more limited editing restriction if necessary. I believe the block has served its purpose, and I am ready to edit responsibly.
:Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. [[User:Drcool 25|Drcool 25]] ([[User talk:Drcool 25#top|talk]]) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. [[User:Drcool 25|Drcool 25]] ([[User talk:Drcool 25#top|talk]]) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
::[[WP:NICETRY|AI-written requests will not be considered.]] The AI doesn’t understand what you did wrong and can’t make promises for you. It would be a good idea to delete this and try again, writing the request in your own words without assistance. [[User:Meadowlark|Meadowlark]] ([[User talk:Meadowlark|talk]]) 04:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am just a newbie on learning to edit and create articles to contribute to Wikipedia. I hope to learn more and give the opportunity to try again |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
{{unblock reviewed |1=I am just a newbie on learning to edit and create articles to contribute to Wikipedia. I hope to learn more and give the opportunity to try again |decline = I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Drcool 25!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 05:15, 8 October 2023 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Draft:Hannan Medispa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:12, 24 October 2023 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Hannan Medispa, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wikishovel (talk) 07:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 07:43, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- A “bare URL and missing title” error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:23, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Hello Drcool 25,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hannan Mohd Yusof for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.
If you feel that the article shouldn’t be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
VickKiang (talk) 04:30, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Drcool 25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:Drcool 25|Drcool 25]] ([[User talk:Drcool 25#top|talk]]) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Drcool 25|Drcool 25]] ([[User talk:Drcool 25#top|talk]]) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:Drcool 25|Drcool 25]] ([[User talk:Drcool 25#top|talk]]) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Unblock request
- I am requesting another review of my block. I understand that my previous unblock request did not clearly address the issues that led to the block, so I will do so directly here.
- === What I was blocked for ===
- I now understand that I was blocked for promotional editing, and conflict of interest
- At the time, I did not fully appreciate how my actions violated Wikipedia’s content and conduct policies, especially WP:NPOV, WP:COI, WP:NOTPROMOTION, WP:RS].
- === Why the block is no longer necessary ===
- I acknowledge the mistake and I am not here to argue that the block was wrong. Instead, I want to show that:
- I understand what I did wrong: I now recognize that ‘my edits article was promotional, lacked independent reliable sources, was written from a non-neutral perspective.
- I will not repeat the behavior: I commit to editing in full compliance with Wikipedia’s policies. If I work on topics connected to people or organizations I know, I will follow conflict-of-interest guidelines, avoid promotional tone, and use reliable independent sources.
- I intend to contribute constructively: My goal is to help improve articles with neutral, well-sourced information. If allowed to return, I will focus on making useful, policy-compliant edits and will seek help at the Teahouse or relevant noticeboards when unsure.
- === Request ===
- Given the above, I respectfully request that the block be lifted or replaced with a more limited editing restriction if necessary. I believe the block has served its purpose, and I am ready to edit responsibly.
- Thank you for taking the time to review my appeal. Drcool 25 (talk) 03:22, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
- AI-written requests will not be considered. The AI doesn’t understand what you did wrong and can’t make promises for you. It would be a good idea to delete this and try again, writing the request in your own words without assistance. Meadowlark (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Drcool 25 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am just a newbie on learning to edit and create articles to contribute to Wikipedia. I hope to learn more and give the opportunity to try again
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 13:48, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
