User talk:Earlsofsandwich: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 62: Line 62:

::::There is no process required, anyone is allowed to remove ECR violating edits.

::::There is no process required, anyone is allowed to remove ECR violating edits.

::::And some pages are protected if all or most of their content is covered by the topic area, but not all pages are protected which have within them elemenrs of the topic. [[User:IOHANNVSVERVS|IOHANNVSVERVS]] ([[User talk:IOHANNVSVERVS|talk]]) 03:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

::::And some pages are protected if all or most of their content is covered by the topic area, but not all pages are protected which have within them elemenrs of the topic. [[User:IOHANNVSVERVS|IOHANNVSVERVS]] ([[User talk:IOHANNVSVERVS|talk]]) 03:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

::Typically, I don’t access Wikipedia on a daily, or even weekly, basis. Thus, I’m just now learning of this dispute. I’m not sure I agree with [[User:IOHANNVSVERVS|IOHANNVSVERVS’s]] interpretation of [[WP:CT]] as it applies to the Zionist section of the article. In any case, I will address the substance of your comment in my reply on [[Talk:Blood_and_soil#Recent_edit_and_revert|talk page]] to [[User:BobFromBrockley|BobFromBrockley]]. [[User:Mox La Push|Mox La Push]] ([[User talk:Mox La Push|talk]]) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

::Typically, I don’t access Wikipedia on a daily, or even weekly, basis. Thus, I’m just now learning of this dispute. I’m not sure I agree with [[User:IOHANNVSVERVS|IOHANNVSVERVS’s]] interpretation of [[WP:CT]] as it applies to the Zionist section of the article. In any case, I will address the substance of your comment in my reply on [[Talk:Blood_and_soil#Recent_edit_and_revert|talk page]] to [[User:BobFromBrockley|BobFromBrockley]]. [[User:Mox La Push|Mox La Push]] ([[User talk:Mox La Push|talk]]) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

==Disambiguation link notification for November 4 ==

==Disambiguation link notification for November 4 ==


Latest revision as of 05:14, 21 November 2025

Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Earlsofsandwich, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.

  • Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
  • Check out some of these pages:
Thanks for the welcome and tip about the tildes Earlsofsandwich (talk) 18:37, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why can’t I edit some particular pages?

Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.

How do I create citations?

  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the ‘An arbitrary website’ bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the ‘Get reference wiki text’ button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}

What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?

A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

Because this is a scholar of genocide and energy law, his article’s deletion without a debate is very likely to be controversial. Please use the process of WP:AfD instead. Bearian (talk) 03:44, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

To edit in the Arab-Israeli topic area on Wikipedia accounts must be at least thirty days old and have at least 500 edits. This includes editing talk pages, with the sole exception being for simple and specific edit requests, which should be in the form of “change x to y for reason z”, complying with EDITXY. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IOHANNVSVERVS are you claiming I can’t edit the talk page of the “Blood and Soil” article because it’s about the Arab-Israeli conflict. That seems incorrect Earlsofsandwich (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You can edit the page Blood and Soil as long as the content you are editing isn’t about the Arab-Israeli conflict. The Zionism section of that article however is within the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 02:40, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s your claim. Isn’t there some process you need to go through? In the past I’ve seen articles be extended-protected automatically. Not some random editor reverting my comments in a talk page Earlsofsandwich (talk) 02:46, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is no process required, anyone is allowed to remove ECR violating edits.
And some pages are protected if all or most of their content is covered by the topic area, but not all pages are protected which have within them elemenrs of the topic. IOHANNVSVERVS (talk) 03:06, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Typically, I don’t access Wikipedia on a daily, or even weekly, basis. Thus, I’m just now learning of this dispute. I’m not sure I agree with IOHANNVSVERVS’s interpretation of WP:CT as it applies to the Zionist section of the article. In any case, I will address the substance of your comment in my reply on the talk page to BobFromBrockley. Mox La Push (talk) 04:13, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sugden, Oklahoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 2000 Census. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top