User talk:EditForImpact: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 19: Line 19:

[[User:Vanderwaalforces|Vanderwaalforces]] ([[User talk:Vanderwaalforces|talk]]) 09:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

[[User:Vanderwaalforces|Vanderwaalforces]] ([[User talk:Vanderwaalforces|talk]]) 09:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

:Hi Vanderwaalforces,

:Thank you for your earlier feedback on the Goodera draft. I’ve revised the article to address the concerns you raised — improving citation quality, adding more independent secondary sources, and rewriting the content to ensure a neutral point of view.

:I’ve resubmitted the updated version and would appreciate it if you could take another look when you have a moment. Please let me know if there are any additional changes needed to meet Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards.

:Thank you for your time and guidance. [[User:EditForImpact|EditForImpact]] ([[User talk:EditForImpact#top|talk]]) 07:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”

{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”


Latest revision as of 07:40, 4 November 2025

Hi, this is my talk page, feel free to drop a message.–EditForImpact (talk) 08:24, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Vanderwaalforces were:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vanderwaalforces,
Thank you for your earlier feedback on the Goodera draft. I’ve revised the article to address the concerns you raised — improving citation quality, adding more independent secondary sources, and rewriting the content to ensure a neutral point of view.
I’ve resubmitted the updated version and would appreciate it if you could take another look when you have a moment. Please let me know if there are any additional changes needed to meet Wikipedia’s notability and sourcing standards.
Thank you for your time and guidance. EditForImpact (talk) 07:40, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, EditForImpact!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:05, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top