User talk:Editor172992: Difference between revisions

Line 36: Line 36:

[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be ”'[[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] without further warning”’ the next time you violate Wikipedia’s [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view policy]] by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Diffs: [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sohrab_Goth_Town&diff=prev&oldid=1316827486][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Jacob_Lines&diff=prev&oldid=1314351933][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Safoora_Goth_Town&diff=prev&oldid=1316827650].<!– Template:uw-npov4 –> [[Special:Contributions/fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four]] ([[User talk:fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four|talk]]) 12:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)

== November 2025 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]]. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of [[Special:Contributions/Editor172992|your recent contributions]]—specifically <span class=”plainlinks”>[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Gulshan-e-Iqbal&diff=1321992679 this edit]</span> to [[:Gulshan-e-Iqbal]]—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]] or the [[Wikipedia:Help desk|Help desk]]. Thanks. <!– Template:Huggle/warn-1 –><!– Template:uw-vandalism1 –>[[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 20:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I’m Codename AD. I noticed that you recently removed content from Jamshoro without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Codename AD ^talk 10:14, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Larkana, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:06, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Larkana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you would like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Criticize (talk) 12:13, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

As above _{so below} 11:14, 26 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sohrab Goth Town, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Afghan. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:55, 14 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation you may be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1][2]. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 12:29, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Safoora Goth Town. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Diff. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 12:41, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia’s neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article. Diffs: [3][4][5]. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 12:43, 15 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gulshan-e-Iqbal—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:36, 13 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment