User talk:Editorfinalboss: Difference between revisions

:Hi, they may look like given names, but they aren’t! Telugu people put surnames/family names before their given names like the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and Hungarians. Look at [[Telugu names]] [[User:Editorfinalboss|Editorfinalboss]] ([[User talk:Editorfinalboss#top|talk]]) 08:41, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, they may look like given names, but they aren’t! Telugu people put surnames/family names before their given names like the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and Hungarians. Look at [[Telugu names]] [[User:Editorfinalboss|Editorfinalboss]] ([[User talk:Editorfinalboss#top|talk]]) 08:41, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Editorfinalboss|Editorfinalboss]] oh, that’s interesting. But would that create confusion? ~[[User:Rafaelthegreat|<b style=”color:red;”>””’Rafael””'</b>]] (He, him) • [[User talk:Rafaelthegreat|talk]] • [[User:Rafaelthegreat/Guestbook|guestbook]] • [[User:Rafaelthegreat/projects|projects]] 13:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Editorfinalboss|Editorfinalboss]] oh, that’s interesting. But would that create confusion? ~[[User:Rafaelthegreat|<b style=”color:red;”>””’Rafael””'</b>]] (He, him) • [[User talk:Rafaelthegreat|talk]] • [[User:Rafaelthegreat/Guestbook|guestbook]] • [[User:Rafaelthegreat/projects|projects]] 13:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)

::@[[User:Editorfinalboss|Editorfinalboss]] Hi, I was just about to comment the same thing. Perhaps it would be useful to state in a short sentence in the lists you create this to avoid confusion? [[User:Equine-man|Equine-man]] ([[User talk:Equine-man|talk]]) 07:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Editorfinalboss|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. I noticed that your recent edit to [[:Nouman Ali Khan]] did not have an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be [[WP:Consensus#Through editing|explained by a clear edit summary]], or by discussion on the [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]]. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be [[Wikipedia:Edit summary legend|quite brief]].

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. Thank you for [[Special:Contributions/Editorfinalboss|your contributions]] to [[Wikipedia:About|Wikipedia]]. I noticed that your recent edit to [[:Nouman Ali Khan]] did not have an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be [[WP:Consensus#Through editing|explained by a clear edit summary]], or by discussion on the [[Help:Talk pages|talk page]]. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be [[Wikipedia:Edit summary legend|quite brief]].

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Editorfinalboss! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:05, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 21:41, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Valluri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Disambig-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

thetechie@enwiki (she/they | talk) 02:21, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Kale (name), but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 16:19, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m David Eppstein. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on S. Rao Kosaraju, but you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you!

Hello @Editorfinalboss! I see you are making multiple given name lists, but you name them as “surnames”. Surnames are last names. Given names are first names. But thank you for making them. ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 05:16, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, they may look like given names, but they aren’t! Telugu people put surnames/family names before their given names like the Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, and Hungarians. Look at Telugu names Editorfinalboss (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorfinalboss oh, that’s interesting. But would that create confusion? ~Rafael (He, him) • talk • guestbook • projects 13:56, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Editorfinalboss Hi, I was just about to comment the same thing. Perhaps it would be useful to state in a short sentence in the lists you create this to avoid confusion? Equine-man (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Nouman Ali Khan did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit and/or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Snuish (talk) 20:57, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Ekdalian (talk) 06:25, 12 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]