User talk:EditorOnJob: Difference between revisions

 

Line 55: Line 55:

Thanks for your contributions to [[Draft:Operation Keller|Operation Keller]]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because ”’it consists of machine-generated text”’.

Thanks for your contributions to [[Draft:Operation Keller|Operation Keller]]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because ”’it consists of machine-generated text”’.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at [[Help:Unreviewed new page]].

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. [[User:Asilvering|asilvering]] ([[User talk:Asilvering|talk]]) 01:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

== [[Draft:1983 Chandigarh Bombing|1983 Chandigarh Bombing]] moved to draftspace ==

Thanks for your contributions to [[Draft:1983 Chandigarh Bombing|1983 Chandigarh Bombing]]. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because ”’it needs more sources to establish notability”’.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Thank you for your efforts in expanding 2024 Pune car crash. Please read MOS:ACCUSED and refrain from using sentences like “Furthermore the minor’s father tampered with the evidence and planned to create false alibis”. A living person accused of a crime is presumed innocent until convicted by a court. A better framing of the sentence can be “Police have alleged that the accused’s father has tampered with evidence”, as this source suggests that he has not yet even been charged with the crime. After he has been charged, we can include “The accused’s father has been charged with tampering with evidence”. AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:38, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for the sentence “Furthermore, the minor was served pizzas and burgers while under the custody”. The police have denied it, and it is only an allegation so far, and no charges or convictions have been made. “It is alleged that the minor was served pizzas and burgers while in custody” seems more appropriate.–AmateurHi$torian (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I’m Codenamewolf. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You’ve used outdated blog/other type of sources for mass additions of OR ridden/unsourced content which has been reverted. Have not checked your previous mass additions, they might have to be reverted as well. Codenamewolf (talk) 23:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you’re interested in South Asian history, would you possibly be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 21:05, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am afraid that you are not yet finished with editing Template:Hindu scriptures and texts. You left a link to Arti in the template. But that is not an article but a disambiguation page. Can you fix that? The Banner talk 20:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EditorOnJob! You’re receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven’t made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you!
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot 🙂 | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that you must be extended confirmed to write on topics related to Indian military history. — asilvering (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I’m Vanamonde93. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Vanamonde93 (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Operation Guddar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text and WP:CT/SA requires extended confirmed.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. asilvering (talk) 01:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Operation Keller. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. asilvering (talk) 01:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to 1983 Chandigarh Bombing. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. asilvering (talk) 01:27, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top