User talk:Elie Bushor: Difference between revisions

A tag has been placed on User:ElieBushor/Reward Eagle draft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sugar Tax (talk) 11:54, 13 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the notification.

This page is a user draft intended for further development and sourcing before submission to the main namespace. It is not intended as a promotional page.

I am happy to improve the draft in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines. ~2026-39848-2 (talk) 07:50, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Elie Bushor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I understand that my recent activity was perceived as promotional, which was not my intention.

The page I created was intended as a user draft for learning purposes and for future development in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, not for advertising or promotion.

I acknowledge my mistake as a new editor and will refrain from creating or editing articles related to organizations with which I am affiliated. I will focus on constructive, policy-compliant contributions if unblocked.

Thank you for your time and consideration. ~2026-39848-2 (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that my recent activity was perceived as promotional, which was not my intention.

The page I created was intended as a user draft for learning purposes and for future development in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, not for advertising or promotion.

I acknowledge my mistake as a new editor and will refrain from creating or editing articles related to organizations with which I am affiliated. I will focus on constructive, policy-compliant contributions if unblocked.

Thank you for your time and consideration. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-39848-2|~2026-39848-2]] ([[User talk:~2026-39848-2|talk]]) 07:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my recent activity was perceived as promotional, which was not my intention.

The page I created was intended as a user draft for learning purposes and for future development in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, not for advertising or promotion.

I acknowledge my mistake as a new editor and will refrain from creating or editing articles related to organizations with which I am affiliated. I will focus on constructive, policy-compliant contributions if unblocked.

Thank you for your time and consideration. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-39848-2|~2026-39848-2]] ([[User talk:~2026-39848-2|talk]]) 07:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that my recent activity was perceived as promotional, which was not my intention.

The page I created was intended as a user draft for learning purposes and for future development in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines, not for advertising or promotion.

I acknowledge my mistake as a new editor and will refrain from creating or editing articles related to organizations with which I am affiliated. I will focus on constructive, policy-compliant contributions if unblocked.

Thank you for your time and consideration. [[Special:Contributions/~2026-39848-2|~2026-39848-2]] ([[User talk:~2026-39848-2|talk]]) 07:52, 19 January 2026 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Hi! To move the unblock request along, it may help if you clarified what you meant by future development, as well as be more specific about which topics you intend to edit in the future. Additionally, you can read our guide for editors with a conflict of interest and our paid-editing policy, and prepare a paid editing disclosure. Showing that you read through those policies by explaining what you understood in your own words can really be reassuring for the reviewing administrators. Remember, we prefer hearing from you, even if the wording might be less polished, rather than from an AI model. If you need any help with wording things, volunteers are here to help you! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 09:53, 19 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Additional clarification: By “future development” I meant that I will not attempt to publish any company/service article. I understand that writing about an organization I am connected to is a conflict of interest and can be seen as advertising.

I have read the COI and paid-editing policies. I understand that Wikipedia requires independent, reliable third-party sources and neutral writing, and that I should not edit promotional content about my own business.

If unblocked, I will focus only on non-commercial, constructive edits such as fixing typos or improving general articles unrelated to any organization I’m affiliated with. ~2026-39848-2 (talk) 11:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

As @331dot said, we need you to log in to your account to confirm that you wrote that request. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 11:19, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

I am logged in to this account and confirm that I wrote the unblock request above. ~~~~ ~2026-39848-2 (talk) 03:28, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

You are, in fact, still not logged in. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 04:25, 4 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]