User talk:Emilydaniel: Difference between revisions

Line 71: Line 71:

:::::::Okay, thanks for that

:::::::Can you then help me with the tag I’ll use and where i can insert it, I want someone who can guilde and mentor me@[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] [[User:Emilydaniel|Emilydaniel]] ([[User talk:Emilydaniel#top|talk]]) 11:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

::::::::@[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]]

::::::::”’Paid contribution disclosure”’

::::::::I am editing Wikipedia on behalf of Jeanne Bender as a paid editor. My contributions are made to improve the accuracy and neutrality of information. I will follow Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and paid editing policies.

::::::::Is it right like this? [[User:Emilydaniel|Emilydaniel]] ([[User talk:Emilydaniel#top|talk]]) 11:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello Emilydaniel. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Emilydaniel. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Emilydaniel|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 14:35, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not paid for editing just trying to improve my skills in writing for authors because I love reading books and books that helps students and personality I think it’s great to share with Wikipedia terms please am sorry if I have done what is wrong please Emilydaniel (talk) 14:44, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And there’s a fact that she’s one of my boss, like someone I looks up to. I feel for her books and that motivate me to work on publishing my own books Emilydaniel (talk) 14:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Jeanne Bender, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

bonadea contributions talk 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Emilydaniel!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 14:41, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jeanne Bender, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 03:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please what error is there in my writing or what cleanup do I have to do to the article, please help me to understand please Emilydaniel (talk) 04:49, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeanne Bender, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeanne Bender until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you’ve significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please is literate books not acceptable on Wikipedia? I have disclose the fact that no payment attached, and I don’t even know the person just trying my editing skills and I’ll appreciate if there can be any form of suggestion on names I can research and write about to increase my writing ability or what to do to improve the current article Emilydaniel (talk) 04:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You said above “she’s one of my boss” so clearly you have a connection which you need to disclose. Theroadislong (talk) 11:02, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong Okay, I got that right there

How do i disclose she’s my boss and you know there’s no form of compesation or anything Emilydaniel (talk) 11:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If she is your boss you will be deemed a paid editor here, see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Theroadislong (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TheroadislongYou mean i must tagged myself that i’m been paid for it? Emilydaniel (talk) 11:33, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s correct. Theroadislong (talk) 11:34, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks for that

Can you then help me with the tag I’ll use and where i can insert it, I want someone who can guilde and mentor me@Theroadislong Emilydaniel (talk) 11:38, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Theroadislong

Paid contribution disclosure

I am editing Wikipedia on behalf of Jeanne Bender as a paid editor. My contributions are made to improve the accuracy and neutrality of information. I will follow Wikipedia’s conflict of interest and paid editing policies.

Is it right like this? Emilydaniel (talk) 11:47, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply