User talk:Fabriemo: Difference between revisions

 

Line 103: Line 103:

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are ”'<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.”’ You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:Fabriemo]]. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=Fabriemo|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, ”’do not edit further”’ until you answer this message. <!– Template:Uw-paid1 –> [[User:MightyRanger|MightyRanger]] ([[User talk:MightyRanger|talk]]) 08:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are ”'<u>required</u> by the [[wmf:TOU#paid-contrib-disclosure|Wikimedia Terms of Use]] to disclose your employer, client and affiliation.”’ You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at [[User:Fabriemo]]. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=Fabriemo|3=employer=<var>InsertName</var>|4=client=<var>InsertName</var>}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, ”’do not edit further”’ until you answer this message. <!– Template:Uw-paid1 –> [[User:MightyRanger|MightyRanger]] ([[User talk:MightyRanger|talk]]) 08:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

:Hey @[[User:MightyRanger|MightyRanger]], I have not received any compensation for my Wikipedia edits. I added the article because I noticed that one did not exist and I thought that the company had enough reliable sources. [[User:Fabriemo|Fabriemo]] ([[User talk:Fabriemo#top|talk]]) 09:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Renate Nyborg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. Curbon7 (talk) 03:55, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
 The comment the reviewer left was:

This page has been moved back from article space to draft space. Please read the comments by the draftifying reviewer and address them. Do not resubmit this draft without addressing the comments of the previous reviewer. If you do not understand why this article was sent back to draft space, ask the reviewer rather than simply resubmitting.

You may ask for advice on how to improve this draft at the Teahouse or on the talk pages of any of the reviewers. (The declining reviewers may advise you to ask for advice at the Teahouse.)

If this draft is resubmitted without any improvement or with very little improvement again, it will almost certainly be rejected, and it may be nominated for deletion, or a partial block may be requested against further submission by the responsible editor.

This draft, as written, does not appear to indicate that one of the biographical notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page or in AFC comments which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the biographical notability criteria at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:GNG for notability, which is the guideline that the subject should be evaluated against.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Robert McClenon (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse logo
Hello, Fabriemo!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 13:40, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit until significant coverage about her from reliable sources can be provided. Current sources are just the announcement she is CEO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

S0091 (talk) 19:32, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Fabriemo. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Renate Nyborg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 25 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Fabriemo. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “Renate Nyborg“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:41, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your recent edits to Vestiaire Collective when you modified the page, you introduced unknown parameters. Just because you specify |some_param=some_variable does not always mean that variable will display. The |some_param= must be defined in the template. You can look at the documentation for the template you are using but it is also helpful to use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and ensure that the values you have added are displaying correctly. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the page will look like without actually saving it. It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 18:08, 20 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fabriemo. Thank you for your work on Moncus Park. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice start! Please add footnotes at the end of each sentence to back up each claim with reliable sources. Thanks and have a wonderful day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 07:30, 27 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Fabriemo. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 15:04, 11 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon

Hello Fabriemo. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Tandem Health, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Fabriemo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Fabriemo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. MightyRanger (talk) 08:25, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @MightyRanger, I have not received any compensation for my Wikipedia edits. I added the article because I noticed that one did not exist and I thought that the company had enough reliable sources. Fabriemo (talk) 09:57, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top