<p><strong>Additionally, you must be logged in, have [[WP:ECR|500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days]] in order to make edits related to two subtopics:</strong> (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.</p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ”procedures”, you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks’ noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!– Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first –> [[User:Ultraodan|Ultraodan]] ([[User talk:Ultraodan|talk]]) 04:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
<p><strong>Additionally, you must be logged in, have [[WP:ECR|500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days]] in order to make edits related to two subtopics:</strong> (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.</p><p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ”procedures”, you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks’ noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Indian military history|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!– Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first –> [[User:Ultraodan|Ultraodan]] ([[User talk:Ultraodan|talk]]) 04:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
:@[[User:Ultraodan|Ultraodan]] Thanks for the notice.. I’ll make sure to follow the guidelines while editing contentious topics [[User:Gamerzer|Gamerzer]] ([[User talk:Gamerzer#top|talk]]) 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
Hi Gamerzer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Graham87 (talk) 03:24, 5 February 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Gamerzer!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes (talk / cont) 21:40, 20 July 2025 (UTC) |
- @UtherSRG
- I had used AI not for generating but only to fix my grammar
- I didn’t wanted to have any grammatical mistakes in the article that’s why I used AI for fixing grammar Gamerzer (talk) 02:47, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- Don’t do that. What you submit for an article must be in your own words. – UtherSRG (talk) 13:46, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
- And looking again at the draft, it is way more than just grammar. – UtherSRG (talk) 13:47, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
I’ve fixed up some of the issues with this draft. You will need to fix the referencing. Each place where you have a number in square brackets you need to replace with the appropriate reference tag. Since there are 11 links to references, and only four of five listed in the refs section, you will need to find the missing references. All the best: Rich Farmbrough 16:38, 9 August 2025 (UTC).
A tag has been placed on Anti-gandhism in India requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Zalaraz (talk) 04:31, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
You have recently edited a page related to the region of South Asia (India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal), broadly construed, including but not limited to history, politics, ethnicity, and social groups, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days in order to make edits related to two subtopics: (1) Indian military history, or (2) social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Ultraodan (talk) 04:51, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
- @Ultraodan Thanks for the notice.. I’ll make sure to follow the guidelines while editing contentious topics Gamerzer (talk) 04:56, 14 October 2025 (UTC)
