User talk:GoldenBootWizard276: Difference between revisions

Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be auto-archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

Hi, could you explain why you redirected a number of these (e.g. 3200 metre, 2000 metre) to 1000 meters? I have fixed them to point to the correct matching number. Rusalkii (talk) 21:16, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rusalkii: My apologies. I had done that by mistake. Thank you for fixing it. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 21:22, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Schlep (pedo hunter) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 04:43, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Statuatory grape requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Shmex crimes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Shmex requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Shmexual assault requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Gang grape requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Grape gang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Schlep (predator catcher) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Roblox bans Schlep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Roblox protects pedos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on ROBLOX protects pedos requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Free Schlep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Planes hit Twin Towers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

A tag has been placed on Terrorists Hijack 4 Airliners, Destroy World Trade Center, Hit Pentagon; Hundreds Dead requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

@45dogs: It is a redirect from a headline on September 11. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Hijacked Jets Destroy Twin Towers and Hit Pentagon in Day of Terror requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

@45dogs: It is a redirect from a headline on September 11. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 17:33, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop creating nonsense redirects. Thanks. — asilvering (talk) 05:28, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering They are not nonsense redirects and you have deleted them without any discussion. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 09:57, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is not required for redirects that meet speedy deletion criteria. Please see WP:R3. If you truly and earnestly believe that “Statuatory grape” is a plausible alternate search term for statutory rape, well, go ahead and recreate it, but I don’t think the ensuing RfD discussions will be a good use of community time. — asilvering (talk) 10:19, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Asilvering: I have recreated some of the deleted redirects. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 12:15, 18 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Thegoofhere (talk) 22:08, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@45dogs: Please stop deleting this page, it is a very plausible redirect. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 11:52, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.2A0E:1D47:9085:D200:F3C6:CB9:911E:FBD7 (talk) 21:37, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The page Rape gang has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 23:00, 22 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Discussing your edits is not optional. You have lost access to edit in article space until you join the AN discussion linked above. Star Mississippi 03:02, 23 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: I can’t find the AN discussion anymore though I did participate in it. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 14:34, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go Wikipedia:Administrators’_noticeboard/Archive373#h-User:GoldenBootWizard276-20250822213600 Star Mississippi 14:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Well the discussion is now archived so I can’t participate any further. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 18:39, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GoldenBootWizard276,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Yobadobee for deletion, because it’s a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don’t want Yobadobee to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don’t remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

–DMartin 22:29, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Yobadobee has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 September 2 § Yobadobee until a consensus is reached. –DMartin 21:35, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: Could you unblock me under those conditions please? GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Do you understand why your redirects were problematic? You didn’t seem to when you participated in the discussion. I’d be willing to consider an unblock with that topic ban in place, but I’m also not sure the issues wouldn’t surface in other areas of your editing so would like to hear more from you on that. Star Mississippi 18:51, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Star Mississippi: I understand that some of the redirects I have created have been problematic as they are not very likely search terms and not very useful redirects. GoldenBootWizard276 (talk) 18:53, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 19:25, 25 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Passengerpigeon was:

This draft’s references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Passenger pigeon (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, GoldenBootWizard276!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Passenger pigeon (talk) 18:36, 27 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sksatsuma was: The comment the reviewer left was:

A few more good reliable sources would help develop notability!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

sk satsuma 09:13, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 6-7 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § 6-7 until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 04:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Six seven has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 October 7 § Six seven until a consensus is reached. ArthananWarcraft (talk) 04:16, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

GoldenBootWizard276 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Could I please be unblocked from editing in the mainspace, on the condition that I am not allowed to create any articles in the mainspace. That way I can continue editing without creating any redirects. [[User:GoldenBootWizard276|GoldenBootWizard276]] ([[User talk:GoldenBootWizard276#top|talk]]) 18:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Could I please be unblocked from editing in the mainspace, on the condition that I am not allowed to create any articles in the mainspace. That way I can continue editing without creating any redirects. [[User:GoldenBootWizard276|GoldenBootWizard276]] ([[User talk:GoldenBootWizard276#top|talk]]) 18:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Could I please be unblocked from editing in the mainspace, on the condition that I am not allowed to create any articles in the mainspace. That way I can continue editing without creating any redirects. [[User:GoldenBootWizard276|GoldenBootWizard276]] ([[User talk:GoldenBootWizard276#top|talk]]) 18:37, 15 October 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Do you also pledge to be better at communicating with others? 331dot (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment