User talk:Gsfelipe94: Difference between revisions

Hello. Once in a while I’ll archive some of the discussions here as manner of keeping this page clean and only with recent subjects. Feel free to check the archives, but if you want to start a new discussion or restart an older one, please do it here. Thanks. Gsfelipe94 (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hik Felipe, Please do not accuse me of being disruptive because I removed your unsourced content. I informed you on the edit summary instead of giving you a warning on your talk page out of courtesy. As mentioned to you many times as per Wikipedia guidelines WP: BURDEN – See below

“All content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and it is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the contribution.

The cited source must clearly support the material as presented in the article. Cite the source clearly, ideally giving page number(s)—though sometimes a section, chapter, or other division may be appropriate instead; see Wikipedia:Citing sources for details of how to do this.

Facts or claims without an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] them may be removed. They should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source.”
So that this as the warning.
Cassiopeia talk 23:22, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Currently most UFC event articles are in a very rudimentary, basic state. The GAs UFC 94 and UFC 148 demonstrate what event articles should ideally look like- complete with detailed information about each fight.

I started work on expanding UFC 320 to be in line with standards, which I noticed you reverted. Rather than keeping it similar to other articles with only basic detail, I encourage you to help expand detailed sections on UFC fight pages with adequate sources, so that more event pages are both more informative and interesting to read besides basic details. The current “background and results only” format should be only a bare minimum, not the norm. HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 17:00, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Most of them are like that because there’s a huge amount of events comparing to other sports… but that’s related to the relevance of the events. The articles you mentioned were updated in a very different time. Nowadays we do have articles with plenty of information, but they are usually big events. Right now we have the White House for e.g.

If you want to add those kind of information in major events, feel free to do it. But please more than just simple fight play-by-play then. And please try to keep the same source pattern for all of them.

Another point (like UFC 94) is that we don’t use the article to make a resume of the fighter, we already have their articles for it. ˜˜˜˜ Gsfelipe94 (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]