User talk:I am bad at usernames: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 114: Line 114:

== Freename ==

== Freename ==

Since you reviewed the submission of [[Freename]], I wonder if you can comment in [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Freename]] the AFD that is going on? [[User:Kyunde|Kyunde]] ([[User talk:Kyunde|talk]]) 21:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

Since you reviewed the submission of [[Freename]], I wonder if you can comment in [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Freename]] the AFD that is going on? [[User:Kyunde|Kyunde]] ([[User talk:Kyunde|talk]]) 21:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)

:I reviewed the article because articles nominated at AfD are usually quickly reviewed, and I reviewed it after the nomination. I’d prefer to stay neutral in the AfD itself. [[User:I am bad at usernames|I am bad at usernames]] ([[User talk:I am bad at usernames|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/I am bad at usernames|contribs]]) 02:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 02:43, 23 October 2025

Hello I am bad at usernames! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Masterhatch (talk) 20:37, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I suggest that it would have been better to escalate the vandalism at Billingshurst to WP:AIV and get more eyeballs on it, rather than battling it on your own? The vandal came back after you stopped watching and their version was on view for a few days. Cabayi (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve no idea where in the USA Chicago is. I think most non-USAians are similar. Secretlondon (talk) 23:21, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My bad, as an American, I assumed it would be common knowledge among non-Americans. Assuming you’re referring to my edit to Pope Leo XIV, I still think that level of explanation on where Illinois is is unnecessary as wikilinks can be used to fulfill a similar purpose, especially in the lead which should be concise. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 23:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here you go. SeaDragon1 (talk) 14:08, 29 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those are physicists. Physicians should be under medicine. Ldm1954 (talk) 16:53, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I got the two mixed up. I added the AFD to the medicine category. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 16:56, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I am bad at usernames, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the new page reviewer user right to your account. This means you now have access to the page curation tools and can start patrolling pages from the new pages feed. If you asked for this at requests for permissions, please check back there to see if your access is time-limited or if there are other comments.

This is a good time to re-acquaint yourself with the guidance at Wikipedia:New pages patrol. Before you get started, please take the time to:

You can find a list of other useful links and tools for patrollers at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Resources. If you are ever unsure what to do, ask your fellow patrollers or just leave the page for someone else to review – you’re not alone! signed, Rosguill talk 17:35, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the “pending changes reviewer” userright, allowing you to review other users’ edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

* Pppery * it has begun… 21:20, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Great Blue Heron doesn’t exist. it shouldn’t exist Oreocooke (talk) 18:12, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? If you mean the redirect, it looks fine to me, but if you want it deleted then nominate it at RfD. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 18:20, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]
update: it has since been re-reviewed. it can exist for now maybe Oreocooke (talk) 18:48, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Since you reviewed the submission of Freename, I wonder if you can comment in Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Freename the AFD that is going on? Kyunde (talk) 21:14, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the article because articles nominated at AfD are usually quickly reviewed, and I reviewed it after the nomination. I’d prefer to stay neutral in the AfD itself. I am bad at usernames (talk | contribs) 02:43, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version