User talk:Iftekharrr: Difference between revisions

 

Line 86: Line 86:

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in [[:Abdulhusein M. Thariani]], disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the [[Help:Getting started|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. <br />Many infoboxes have additional stylistic conventions, such as not naming parents or other relatives in biographical infoboxes unless they are [[WP:N|notable]] (loosely speaking, have a Wikipedia article about them). See [[Template:Infobox_person/doc]] for more information.<!– Template:uw-mos1 –> –[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 19:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style|Manual of Style]] that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in [[:Abdulhusein M. Thariani]], disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the [[Help:Getting started|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. <br />Many infoboxes have additional stylistic conventions, such as not naming parents or other relatives in biographical infoboxes unless they are [[WP:N|notable]] (loosely speaking, have a Wikipedia article about them). See [[Template:Infobox_person/doc]] for more information.<!– Template:uw-mos1 –> –[[User:Worldbruce|Worldbruce]] ([[User talk:Worldbruce|talk]]) 19:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)

== December 2025 ==

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Iftekharrr|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an [[Help:Edit summary|edit summary]]. Please do your best to {{strong|always fill in the summary field}}. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in [[Special:Preferences#mw-prefsection-editing|your preferences]]. Thanks! <!– Template:Uw-editsummary2 –> [[User:BlockArranger|BlockArranger]] ([[User talk:BlockArranger|talk]]) 19:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)

Hey there! I noticed this change you made on the Bluesky article. I sorta reverted it because it was unclear why a short description, the two navigational hatnotes to similarly named articles, and spelling/date format maintenance templates had to be removed. These elements are not uncommon in Wikipedia articles, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout#Order of article elements. “This article is about the social media service. Its owner known as Bluesky Social, PBC” is already mentioned by the opening paragraph and infobox, did you mean to change the short description (currently Social media service)? If so, please see the short description info page, it is supposed to be brief. Sorry for any inconvenience! Feel free to reply or post a message on my talk page if you need any help. ObserveOwl (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and it doesn’t seem like you’ve been welcomed, so here goes! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Our intro page provides helpful information for new users—please check it out! If you have any questions, you can get help from experienced editors at the Teahouse. Happy editing! ObserveOwl (talk) 11:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Iiftekhar! Your additions to Mahmudur Rahman have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:53, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the “Save” button.
Thanks! Niasoh ❯❯❯ Wanna chat? 14:28, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Institute of Policy Studies (Pakistan), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 6 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Rht bd. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it’s important that article content be verifiable. If you’d like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Rht bd (talk) 15:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Pinaki Bhattacharya, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:39, 18 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aga Khan University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:58, 1 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Apache Software Foundation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wilmington.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 08:00, 17 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at University of Dhaka, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Raihanur (talk) 11:34, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Dhaka Stock Exchange, you may be blocked from editing. Raihanur (talk) 11:37, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Shadik Kayem. Raihanur (talk) 11:40, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia’s biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Runa Laila, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rht bd (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! BlockArranger (talk) 11:22, 27 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Syed Sajjad Hussain, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Academic.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 19:49, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Abdulhusein M. Thariani, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Many infoboxes have additional stylistic conventions, such as not naming parents or other relatives in biographical infoboxes unless they are notable (loosely speaking, have a Wikipedia article about them). See Template:Infobox_person/doc for more information. —Worldbruce (talk) 19:38, 4 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! BlockArranger (talk) 19:12, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]