Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Utopia of the Seas have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this message: Utopia of the Seas was changed by OfficiaILido (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.96637 on 2025-08-26T20:20:28+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:20, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Glasses. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can’t find what you are looking for there, place
{{Help me}}on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Glasses was changed by OfficiaILido (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.941309 on 2025-08-26T20:47:43+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2025 (UTC)
- A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 00:19, 27 August 2025 (UTC)
Hello, OfficiaILido, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 13:12, 30 August 2025 (UTC)
Toilet cleaning really, I don’t think Wikipedia is that hard up:) Jp33442 (talk) 20:25, 3 September 2025 (UTC)
- You must be a lot of fun at parties. All jokes aside its an exageration! OfficiaILido (talk) 00:02, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I know still found it funny thats all. Jp33442 (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
I just wanted to comment on it; it perfectly fine to go to WP:AIV even if you are involved in being harassed, and you should do so swiftly. You have Twinkle, which makes it easy to do so. I would also suggest WP:ANI if the editor violating WP:NPA has been constructive in the past, but either one works. Happy editing 🙂 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 01:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello, OfficiaILido,
I saw on your User page where you state you want to help other editors. While that is an awesome goal to have, it is far too soon for you to be experienced enough to help other editors. You have only had this account for a week and have made only 38 edits so far. So, your focus right now should be on gaining more editing experience and knowledge about how Wikipedia operates, along with its many policies and guidelines. Maybe if you become a regular editor, you will know enough to be helpful to new editors in a few months but as for now, you shouldn’t be handing out advice as you are just a newbie yourself.
If you have questions about editing here, please bring them to the Teahouse. It’s a great place for new editors like yourself can go and get advice and support from more experienced editors. It really helped me when I was first starting out back in 2013 and I’m sure that it can be for you, too. Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 02:36, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- For example, in this edit to Ogaboga69, all of your information here was incorrect. Twinkle isn’t used to make reports to ANI and “investigative reports”, whatever those are, are not reviewed by a WMF steward. And it is very uncommon for a blocked editor’s IP to be globally blocked across all Wikimedia projects unless they are a LTA sockpuppet. I can see that, in your way, you were trying to help Ogaboga69 but your advice to them was not based in actual practices on the English Wikipedia. Please refrain from counseling editors who are on the verge of getting blocked until you are more familiar with the processes here. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 02:51, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi Its Lido. I appreciate your desire to introduce new editors to the project, sending welcome messages on their talk pages. However, the vast majority (around 80%) are just user-talk edits. This gives the impression of WP:PGAMEing happening. For anti-vandalism work, the counter-vandalism unit has instructions on what to do. Happy editing 🙂 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:27, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- I am truely sorry I am fairly new here myself and I was just trying to use Twinkle to make Wikipedians like me stay longer. If you can please state what I am doing wrong. Its Lido (talk) 00:29, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- So there isn’t anything objectively wrong with what you are doing, and again being nice to new editors is a good thing. My personal concern is just over a perceived WP:PGAMEing, which is when many trivial or non-constructive edits are made in order to gain autoconfirmed or extended-confirmed permissions. I wouldn’t suggest to stop doing it necessarily, just perhaps do some other editing in between, specifically in regards to anti-vandalism, which you have expressed an interest in. Also, if you are doing these edits to gain extended-confirmed permissions, please don’t. Extended confirmed protection (which to my knowledge is the only thing extended confirmed actually does) isn’t perfect, but its designed to attempt to create an automated method where by less experienced editors won’t be able to enter certain articles, in order to prevent disruption.
- Though honestly, I’m not entirely sure what the best solution is. If you are willing to do so, perhaps a limit of sending welcome messsages to accounts with at least one edit? A fair number of people have accounts but have no intention of actually editing. Or, getting more experience in editing would also make it clear you aren’t just attempting to permission-game. Happy editing (and apologies for the block of text!) 🙂 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) 00:40, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
- I would recommend welcoming editors who have made constructive edits rather than welcoming accounts with zero edits or unconstructive ones. Welcoming is fine, encouraged even, but you should be discerning with who you do welcome. jellyfish ✉ 22:53, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please use the specified draft above. There really is no need to iterate multiple drafts about the same topic.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Its Lido!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 22:57, 16 September 2025 (UTC) |
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Spawn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Spawn until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
λ NegativeMP1 18:27, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on The Spawn requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Tankishguy :)(: (talk) 22:15, 17 September 2025 (UTC)
As part of the Welcoming Committee, I would like to remind you that we do not welcome editors with zero edits with templates. Kinda pointless when they do not engage with Wikipedia in the first place. Go D. Usopp (talk) 00:22, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spawnism (The Spawn), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spawn. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
Hello, Its Lido,
If you want to change the target article of a Redirect page, please take it to WP:RFD and make a proposal. Several of your changes led to broken redirects where the redirect points to a nonexistent page and that can result in a page deletion so they have been undone. If you want to make a significant change, take it to RFD where the change can be discussed.
If you have questions about editing policies or practices on this project, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 21:54, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Yeah, the page got deleted. Its Lido (talk) 22:04, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
The file File:SpawnpointRBX.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Article this image was used in was deleted and I can’t see another use for this file except for vandalism.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file’s talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 22:06, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
- Bro how is it used for vandalism Its Lido (talk) 22:07, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
The article Victory Martial Arts has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Only the kens5.com source could conceivably contribute to notability, and even that’s questionable. There are likely no other sources which are both secondary and sigcov.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Based5290 :3 (talk) 23:01, 18 September 2025 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Victory Martial Arts is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Victory Martial Arts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
TheAlienAdventures (talk) 07:59, 20 September 2025 (UTC)
Hi, It’s Lido,
Welcome to Wikipedia! I appreciate your enthusiasm for contributing and engaging with other users. However, while they were most likely in good faith, I noticed that some of your recent edits on user talk pages, such as your comment on User talk:Humanity Network in Uganda suggesting that you could create a page for them, may not align with Wikipedia’s guidelines, particularly WP:HOST and WP:SOAP. Offering to create pages for others or providing advice as a new editor can sometimes come across as promotional or outside standard practices.
As a relatively new editor, I recommend focusing on simpler tasks to build your experience, such as making basic copyedits (e.g., fixing typos, grammar, or formatting) or exploring tasks listed in the Task Centre. Tools like Twinkle are great but can be complex for new users, so starting with straightforward edits might be a good way to get familiar with Wikipedia’s policies.
If you have any questions or need guidance, feel free to ask me or visit the Teahouse for support from the community. Keep up the good work, and happy editing!
Best regards,
Pr0m37h3u$ 11:35, 23 September 2025 (UTC)
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Admin abuse, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. – Frood (talk) 01:02, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:
Its Lido (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I opened up a checkuser investigation and then 5 minutes later I get slapped with a block I do not understand this, who am I socking of? [[User:Its Lido|Its Lido]] ([[User talk:Its Lido#top|talk]]) 23:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=I opened up a checkuser investigation and then 5 minutes later I get slapped with a block I do not understand this, who am I socking of? [[User:Its Lido|Its Lido]] ([[User talk:Its Lido#top|talk]]) 23:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=I opened up a checkuser investigation and then 5 minutes later I get slapped with a block I do not understand this, who am I socking of? [[User:Its Lido|Its Lido]] ([[User talk:Its Lido#top|talk]]) 23:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Its Lido (talk) 23:14, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
Also @AmandaNp
@AmandaNP We need to talk about why i was falsely blocked. Its Lido (talk) 23:16, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
- As the block log states, WP:GHBH, aka don’t log out and vandalize. — Amanda (she/her) 23:24, 28 September 2025 (UTC)
