From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
|
:I wasn’t providing false information. Even government sources agree. If you have such a problem with me then fix it yourself . Literally provided the evidence for my claim [[User:JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV|JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV]] ([[User talk:JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV#top|talk]]) 10:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC) |
:I wasn’t providing false information. Even government sources agree. If you have such a problem with me then fix it yourself . Literally provided the evidence for my claim [[User:JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV|JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV]] ([[User talk:JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV#top|talk]]) 10:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC) |
||
|
::You completely ignored what I wrote you. [[User:Largoplazo|Largoplazo]] ([[User talk:Largoplazo|talk]]) 10:13, 20 October 2025 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 10:13, 20 October 2025
There are constructive ways to deal with a disagreement and constructive ways to get yourself able to edit again after you’ve been blocked. Then there are the pointless ones that won’t get you anywhere even if there is merit to what you have to say. Why do you keep choosing the pointless approaches? Largoplazo (talk) 10:10, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- I wasn’t providing false information. Even government sources agree. If you have such a problem with me then fix it yourself . Literally provided the evidence for my claim JamesMadisonLargoPlazoIV (talk) 10:12, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
- You completely ignored what I wrote you. Largoplazo (talk) 10:13, 20 October 2025 (UTC)
