User talk:Jengod: Difference between revisions

Tag: MassMessage delivery

Line 36: Line 36:

(This message was sent to [[:User:Jengod]] and is being posted here due to a redirect.)

<!– Message sent by User:Samwalton9 (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Wikipedia_Library/Newsletter/Recipients&oldid=29991504 –>

==[[:Category:Political history of the Confederate States of America]] has been nominated for discussion==

<div class=”floatleft” style=”margin-bottom:0″>[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>[[:Category:Political history of the Confederate States of America]] has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the [[Wikipedia:Categorization|categorization]] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ”'[[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2026 January 31#Category:Political history of the Confederate States of America|the category’s entry]]”’ on the [[Wikipedia:Categories for discussion|categories for discussion]] page.<!– Template:Cfd-notify–> Thank you. [[User:Pppery|* Pppery *]] [[User talk:Pppery|<sub style=”color:#800000″>it has begun…</sub>]] 04:29, 31 January 2026 (UTC)

cheers and jeers go here

Hello, Jengod. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Historical reputation of Andrew Jackson, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:08, 1 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B.M.R. PRODUCTIONS PRESENTS THE EXPOSURE OF RAYMOND SPLOTROUS and THE HOWIE RUBIN STORY (An Evening of One Act Plays) By Philip Mishkin.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 03:06, 4 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Baffle gab1978 thank you so much for this jengod (talk) 12:04, 16 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; to keep the focus on Hays, I’ve removed moved some of the text that is less-relevant to Hays, and moved some to the footnotes section. I realise there’s a complex interplay going on here though. There’s probably more material that could also be either removed or sent to footnotes, but I’ll leave that to someone who’s closer to the article. Good luck and cheers, 🅑🅐🅖 ☿ 🅴🅻🅵🅵🅰🅱 13:20, 18 January 2026 (UTC).[reply]

That’s just what I would expect from an excellent editor. Thank you so much for parachuting in. Thank you for volunteering your brain and your language expertise on Wikipedia. You are so appreciated @Baffle gab1978! Best wishes, jengod (talk) 17:59, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Code name Geronimo controversy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Code name Geronimo controversy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Longhornsg (talk) 03:35, 18 January 2026 (UTC)[reply]