User talk:Jfjfne: Difference between revisions

Line 63: Line 63:

* I used [[CheckUser]] to see if you had abused multiple accounts recently, and I can’t give you an all clear, as there is a [[wp:temporary account|temporary account]] on your IP which has made an edit. I will wait for other checkusers to give their opinion. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 17:57, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

* I used [[CheckUser]] to see if you had abused multiple accounts recently, and I can’t give you an all clear, as there is a [[wp:temporary account|temporary account]] on your IP which has made an edit. I will wait for other checkusers to give their opinion. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 17:57, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

*It was not me, as i has not edited for over a year, so it was likely another person tryna impersonate me. I know i used to create those stupid sockpuppets, but i never did that again bro. The case was long time ago around 2023 or 2024 i forgot, but after getting exposed for these sockpuppeting which to be honest was a stupid idea, i abided by the rules of these. Now, I only edited my talk page, like trying to appeal to get unblocked since what i did was literally the most sh*tty thing ive done, and i would never do that thing again cuz i know the consequences now.

*It was not me, as i has not edited for over a year, so it was likely another person tryna impersonate me. I know i used to create those stupid sockpuppets, but i never did that again bro. The case was long time ago around 2023 or 2024 i forgot, but after getting exposed for these sockpuppeting which to be honest was a stupid idea, i abided by the rules of these. Now, I only edited my talk page, like trying to appeal to get unblocked since what i did was literally the most sh*tty thing ive done, and i would never do that thing again cuz i know the consequences now.

[[User:Jjfne|Jjfne]] ([[User talk:Jjfne|talk]]) 12:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

[[User:|]] ([[User talk:|talk]]) 12:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Jfjfne, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Nairobi Collision, may not conform to some of Wikipedia’s content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! AusLondonder (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Nairobi Collision. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – 2024 Nairobi mid-air collision. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speeedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at 2024 Nairobi mid-air collision. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article’s talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. AusLondonder (talk) 16:52, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, 2024 Nairobi mid-air collision, may not conform to some of Wikipedia’s guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read “Your first article“. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 17:00, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nairobi mid-air collision.jpg. You don’t seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image’s creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the “Edit” tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image’s description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. —ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suddenly found a user near my IP adress but I’m not gonna say it because it is a swear word.
I got blocked from editing pages. Can you ban that user?

Wikipedia’s technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.


Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

After your block, you set up Chocolatecraver to continue evading your block. I strongly oppose unblocking this user at this time. —Yamla (talk) 10:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

icon

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jfjfne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Ok I will never create them after I set up Chocolatecraver. I am very serious. I will not create accounts again after this. I’m never creating accounts after this. I learned my lesson. I am sorry for lying to all of you. I feel guilty after this. I promise to never evade blocks ever again. Jfjfne (talk) 12:10, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

At this point, WP:SO is probably your best option. That requires six months with zero block evasion, zero edits. As of right now, that would make you eligible on 2024-09-19, assuming you cease evading your block and stop making edits (including here). —Yamla (talk) 13:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

icon

This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jfjfne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

Alright, so what I found out was a complete and huge mistake to me. From the last time I became a sockpuppetry that violates the Wikipedia rules or more, I spent a long time to view all the rules required to be a valid user. Realizing I have affected the community, I’ve stopped doing that. And right now, I acknowledged my mistakes, and I have grown from my past actions. And I knew that all of you that blocked me, you all did the right thing. And now, I will follow all the rules and will actually help the community when needed. I have learned from all these challenges and errors that I used to make. I felt really remorseful for doing all my past actions and I know that it was a terrible thing to do. I am fully responsible with all these penalties that I recieved. So if you can possibly unblock me, I would appreciate it, however, if you don’t, well, it’s totally fine for me. Jfjfne (talk) 14:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Jfjfne (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))


Request reason:

wassup mods, it has already been 5th of november as of my knowledge, is that correct?. I have waited for 67 months, changed and i seriously would never ever make some stupid bs anymore. I respect the official wiki guidelines and i stand by them. I would respect these nowadays and has been blocked for more than a year. Hopefully yall understand whats wrong with me and i did not intend to create stupid accounts like that. I just wanna be a useful guy that intends no harm to the community, including edits to the pages. If you unblock me i would help in real time events of windows 11 and its updates. Im now serious and if i were to be a moderator, i would protect this comunity and stand by my words. You could watch me for a year and i wont do anything stupid anymore. Anyways Thnks Jfjfne (talk) 01:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=wassup mods, it has already been 5th of november as of my knowledge, is that correct?. I have waited for 67 months, changed and i seriously would never ever make some stupid bs anymore. I respect the official wiki guidelines and i stand by them. I would respect these nowadays and has been blocked for more than a year. Hopefully yall understand whats wrong with me and i did not intend to create stupid accounts like that. I just wanna be a useful guy that intends no harm to the community, including edits to the pages. If you unblock me i would help in real time events of windows 11 and its updates. Im now serious and if i were to be a moderator, i would protect this comunity and stand by my words. You could watch me for a year and i wont do anything stupid anymore. Anyways Thnks [[User:Jfjfne|Jfjfne]] ([[User talk:Jfjfne#top|talk]]) 01:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=wassup mods, it has already been 5th of november as of my knowledge, is that correct?. I have waited for 67 months, changed and i seriously would never ever make some stupid bs anymore. I respect the official wiki guidelines and i stand by them. I would respect these nowadays and has been blocked for more than a year. Hopefully yall understand whats wrong with me and i did not intend to create stupid accounts like that. I just wanna be a useful guy that intends no harm to the community, including edits to the pages. If you unblock me i would help in real time events of windows 11 and its updates. Im now serious and if i were to be a moderator, i would protect this comunity and stand by my words. You could watch me for a year and i wont do anything stupid anymore. Anyways Thnks [[User:Jfjfne|Jfjfne]] ([[User talk:Jfjfne#top|talk]]) 01:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=wassup mods, it has already been 5th of november as of my knowledge, is that correct?. I have waited for 67 months, changed and i seriously would never ever make some stupid bs anymore. I respect the official wiki guidelines and i stand by them. I would respect these nowadays and has been blocked for more than a year. Hopefully yall understand whats wrong with me and i did not intend to create stupid accounts like that. I just wanna be a useful guy that intends no harm to the community, including edits to the pages. If you unblock me i would help in real time events of windows 11 and its updates. Im now serious and if i were to be a moderator, i would protect this comunity and stand by my words. You could watch me for a year and i wont do anything stupid anymore. Anyways Thnks [[User:Jfjfne|Jfjfne]] ([[User talk:Jfjfne#top|talk]]) 01:23, 28 November 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
  • It was not me, as i has not edited for over a year, so it was likely another person tryna impersonate me. I know i used to create those stupid sockpuppets, but i never did that again bro. The case was long time ago around 2023 or 2024 i forgot, but after getting exposed for these sockpuppeting which to be honest was a stupid idea, i abided by the rules of these. Now, I only edited my talk page, like trying to appeal to get unblocked since what i did was literally the most sh*tty thing ive done, and i would never do that thing again cuz i know the consequences now. Yall did the right thing honestly, but i really wanna help the wiki community fr this time. Im guilty for what ive done and im wrong. Srry admins, pls gimme mercy.

Jfjfne (talk) 12:16, 29 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top