User talk:JohnDavies9612: Difference between revisions

Line 246: Line 246:

<p>Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics ”procedures”, you may ask them at the [[WT:AC/C|arbitration clerks’ noticeboard]] or you may learn more about this contentious topic [[Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Editing of Biographies of Living Persons|here]]. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. </p>}}<!– Derived from Template:Contentious topics/alert/first –> [[User:ToBeFree|~ ToBeFree]] ([[User talk:ToBeFree|talk]]) 00:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, I apologize for what happened. I was just carrying out my responsibilities as [[WP:RCP]] using [[WP:UV]]. I just do rollback to the IP because he removed content on a large scale and did not give any reason. If I was wrong, I apologize. Thank you. [[User:JohnDavies9612|JohnDavies9612]] ([[User talk:JohnDavies9612#top|talk]]) 03:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello, JohnDavies9612, and welcome to Wikipedia! While efforts to improve Wikipedia are always welcome, unfortunately your contributions are not written in an English that is good enough to be useful. You appear to be more familiar with Malay; did you know there is a Wikipedia in Malay? You may prefer to contribute there instead. In any case, welcome to the project, and thank you for your efforts! If you need help, please feel free to notify me on my talk page. Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnDavies9612, dan selamat datang ke Wikipedia! Ketika usaha untuk meningkatkan Wikipedia sentiasa dialu-alukan, mungkin, malangnya sumbangan anda tidak ditulis dalam bahasa Inggeris yang cukup baik untuk digunakan. Anda muncul dan lebih selesa dengan berbahasa Melayu; dan adakah anda tahu bahawa terdapat Wikipedia bahasa Melayu? Anda mungkin lebih memilih untuk menyumbang di sana. Walau bagaimanapun, selamat datang ke projek, dan terima kasih atas usaha anda! Gommeh 📖/🎮 13:30, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making a report about Seanwk (talk · contribs · block log) at Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, it appears that the editor you reported may not have engaged in vandalism, or the user was not sufficiently or appropriately warned. Please note there is a difference between vandalism and unhelpful or misguided edits made in good faith. If the user continues to vandalise after a recent final warning, please re-report them. Thank you. Ad Orientem (talk) 05:24, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

okay admin. I will try to do my best. JohnDavies9612 (talk) 08:47, 27 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the confusion. I am a newcomer and haven’t read all of the guidelines yet. Seanwk :] (talk) 01:26, 28 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Aiman Danish. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 03:33, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Telok Gong F.C.. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and require WP:RS, WP:IS and not the currently provided user generated/social media sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. QEnigma 论 06:37, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Rambley 🦝 (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JohnDavies9612!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley 🦝 (talk) 08:58, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Haj was: The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Haj (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

		The Categorisation Barnstar
		Hi JohnDavies9612, thanks for creating several categories as you created at the category SEA Games medalists by country.

Sham1975 (talk) 11:02, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. JohnDavies9612 (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JohnDavies9612! We’re so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

— 12:32, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Michael Onyekachi Ozor. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Thanks for your contributions to Patrick Gama. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

– haj ☘ (talk) 01:26, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks admin.

JohnDavies9612 (talk) 06:55, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:13, 16 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Immigration F.C. II. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Kaffet i halsen (talk) 08:00, 17 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was: The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails to meet GNG or SIGCOV.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Fade258 (talk) 02:16, 18 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Malaysia A2 Amateur League players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:57, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Malaysia A3 Community League players indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Absurdum4242 was: The comment the reviewer left was:

Unfortunately this article still does not have the necessary significant coverage to establish notability for the subject. We need to have 2-3 sources of significant coverage, which are reliable, independent secondary sources (so stats pages don’t count), and which cover Ozor for at least a couple of paragraphs, in non-routine coverage (so basic match reports / signing announcements etc don’t count). Good luck and I hope you find some so that you can submit this article again in the future… however, be aware that without these sources, there is no chance of this article being accepted, no matter how much work is done on the prose itself, or adding less robust sources. Good luck 👍

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Absurdum4242 (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks’ noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:25, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I apologize for what happened. I was just carrying out my responsibilities as WP:RCP using WP:UV. I just do rollback to the IP because he removed content on a large scale and did not give any reason. If I was wrong, I apologize. Thank you. JohnDavies9612 (talk) 03:42, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment