User talk:JoidC: Difference between revisions

[[User:RangersRus|RangersRus]] ([[User talk:RangersRus|talk]]) 21:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

[[User:RangersRus|RangersRus]] ([[User talk:RangersRus|talk]]) 21:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Happymon Jacob|Happymon Jacob]] (September 28) ==

<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by Thilsebatti was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–

—

–> Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Happymon Jacob]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Happymon_Jacob ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Thilsebatti&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Happymon_Jacob ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

[[User:Thilsebatti|Thilsebatti]] ([[User talk:Thilsebatti|talk]]) 03:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>

Thank very much for your generosity, I’m trying to add citations as much possible. JoidC (talk) 17:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much. JoidC (talk) 16:30, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

MCE89 (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoidC! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 13:31, 13 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoidC. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page JoidC/Happymon Jacob, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. jolielover♥talk 10:31, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your guidance. I am not connected anyway with the person Happymon Jacob. Thank you. JoidC (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I’ve moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Happymon Jacob, from its old location at User:JoidC. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Agent 007 (talk) 15:07, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Agent007 thank you for your kind words but i cant find the Draft of Happymon Jacob, could you please guide me through what happened to the draft ? JoidC (talk) 16:00, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

JOidC/Happymon Jacob was correctly moved to User:JOidC/Happymon Jacob. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:55EC:9CCF:4079:BE1 (talk) 17:37, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your reply, so it is under review to get into the mainspace right ? JoidC (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s right, best of luck with the review. 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:55EC:9CCF:4079:BE1 (talk) 17:45, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Happymon Jacob requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. qcne (talk) 18:56, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can it be known that for what possible reason it has been tagged with a speedy deletion cause notability and other criterions have been checked properly when it was drafted, so if it can be reconsidered and checked properly ? It was mistakenly redirected to a different page called Rakkam A Sangma while the draft is about Happymon Jacob. So if it be corrected then the problem will be solved and if you please can guide me through to get rid of this problem. JoidC (talk) 19:10, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @JoidC. I have only marked the redirect for deletion so a new draft can be moved to it’s place. You haven’t done anything wrong. qcne (talk) 19:12, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ok my bad, thanks qcne, it was really nice to talk with you. JoidC (talk) 19:13, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

So, the draft Happymon Jacob is still there to be checked and waiting to be moved to mainspace ? if I’m not mistaken right ? JoidC (talk) 19:15, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved the draft to the correct location at Draft:Happymon Jacob – it will be reviewed in due course 🙂 qcne (talk) 19:17, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. JoidC (talk) 19:18, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It wasnt mistakenly, i know since the redirect is deleted, nobody can see the revision, but the page had the exact same source code as Rakkam A Sangma which JoidC created themselves. 2606:9400:98A0:92A0:58E4:EB7B:8388:616C (talk) 11:43, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

RangersRus (talk) 21:21, 4 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Thilsebatti was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Thilsebatti (talk) 03:12, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]