User talk:Josedm: Difference between revisions

Hello, Josedm! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cannibaloki 16:26, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Walls and Bridges you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Walls and Bridges for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Cannibaloki 16:28, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to George Harrison, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 00:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

“Minor edit” has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Read Help:Minor edit for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 16:00, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose Hello. I only reversed the order of two photographs according to the chronological order in the Ringo Starr article, so I didn’t consider it a big change. Josedm (talk) 19:22, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That’s not a typo correction or reverting obvious vandalism. When you state that an edit is minor, you’re saying that there’s zero chance anyone would disagree with your edit. You may consider moving images minor, but that doesn’t mean everyone will agree with you. It was not a minor edit. Let me suggest that you never mark an edit as minor. You can never go wrong doing that. Sundayclose (talk) 20:38, 6 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I’ll avoid marking future edits as minor here. But could I please put the photos back in the order I had them in? Of course, without marking it as a minor edit. Josedm (talk) 00:31, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Why? You didn’t bother to leave an edit summary. Sundayclose (talk) 01:18, 7 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]