|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>
|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Draft:Elyce Arons]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
A tag has been placed on [[:Draft:Elyce Arons]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under [[WP:CSD#G15|section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion]], because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by [[large language model]]s (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any ”reasonable human review”:
* ”’Communication intended for the user”’: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
* ”’Implausible non-existent references”’: This may include external links that are [[Wikipedia:Link rot|dead]] on arrival, [[ISBN]]s with invalid [[checksum]]s, and unresolvable [[Digital Object Identifiers|DOI]]s. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from [[link rot]], a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
* ”’Nonsensical citations”’: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may ”’contest the nomination”’ by [[:Draft:Elyce Arons|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines]]. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]], and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions.<!– Template:Db-llm-notice –> <!– Template:Db-csd-notice-custom –> [[User:Sophisticatedevening|<span style=”color: purple”>Sophisticatedevening</span>]]<sup>[[User talk:Sophisticatedevening|<span style=”color: purple”>(talk)</span>]]</sup> 18:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sophisticatedevening was:
The comment the reviewer left was:
All of your sources don’t exist and 404.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, JResearchWrites!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sophisticatedevening🍷(talk) 01:15, 2 June 2025 (UTC) |
A tag has been placed on Draft:Elyce Arons requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it exhibits one or more of the following signs which indicate that the page could only plausibly have been generated by large language models (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology) and would have been removed by any reasonable human review:
- Communication intended for the user: This may include collaborative communication (e.g., “Here is your Wikipedia article on…”), knowledge-cutoff disclaimers (e.g., “Up to my last training update …”), self-insertion (e.g., “as a large language model”), and phrasal templates (e.g., “Smith was born on [Birth Date].”)
- Implausible non-existent references: This may include external links that are dead on arrival, ISBNs with invalid checksums, and unresolvable DOIs. Since humans can make typos and links may suffer from link rot, a single example should not be considered definitive. Editors should use additional methods to verify whether a reference truly does not exist.
- Nonsensical citations: This may include citations of incorrect temporality (e.g a source from 2020 being cited for a 2022 event), DOIs that resolve to completely unrelated content (e.g., a paper on a beetle species being cited for a computer science article), and citations that attribute the wrong author or publication.
Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and output must be carefully checked. Pages created using them that did not undergo human review may be deleted at any time.
If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find creating new encyclopedia content yourself difficult, please share this with other editors at the Teahouse, and they may be able to help. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your legitimate contributions. Sophisticatedevening(talk) 18:30, 16 September 2025 (UTC)
