User talk:Jriteshofficial: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


Line 26: Line 26:

Please see more information at [[Help:Unreviewed new page]].

Please see more information at [[Help:Unreviewed new page]].

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)

:I have moved this back to drafts, for the second time. We don’t normally draftify more than once, but the other alternative would have been to delete this, since there is no evidence that the person is notable. I trust you agree this was the better option from your point of view.

:Needless to say, do ”’not”’ move this back into the main article space again, or it will be deleted. — [[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing]] ([[User talk:DoubleGrazing|talk]]) 15:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)


Revision as of 15:47, 31 October 2025

Thanks for your contributions to Kashindra Sharma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you have a conflict of interest in this subject.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:28, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand, you are not allowed to publish directly in the main article space articles on any subject in which you have a conflict of interest, including (but not limited to) News Bureau Nepal or its founder Kashindra Sharma. I have started an AfD deletion discussion on the former, and moved the latter to drafts. I trust you will comply with our policies going forward, so that I don’t need to block you from editing. Thank you. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:31, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
I told you not to directly publish articles, which includes moving them from the draft space to main space, in the subjects of which you have a COI. Since you apparently are either unable or unwilling to heed this, I have blocked you temporarily. If you continue this behaviour after your block expires, you can expect the next block to be considerably longer. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m new to Wikipedia and still learning how things work here. I truly respect the experience of senior editors like you. My intention was never to cause any disruption. I was only trying to create a page for a verified media company and a public figure from Nepal, using reliable sources.


I understand there may have been some mistakes from my side, and I’m happy to learn and improve. I would really appreciate your guidance and support instead of strict action. Thank you for your time and understanding. Jriteshofficial (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Kashindra Sharma. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you have a stated conflict of interest in this subject.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:45, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved this back to drafts, for the second time. We don’t normally draftify more than once, but the other alternative would have been to delete this, since there is no evidence that the person is notable. I trust you agree this was the better option from your point of view.
Needless to say, do not move this back into the main article space again, or it will be deleted. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:47, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top