User talk:Judgejury28: Difference between revisions

 

Line 35: Line 35:

”’Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] Wikipedia”’&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor ”must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period”. Undoing another editor’s work&mdash;whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time&mdash;counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;”’even if you do not violate the three-revert rule”’&mdash;should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page.<!– Template:uw-3rr –> [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 16:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

”’Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]] Wikipedia”’&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor ”must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period”. Undoing another editor’s work&mdash;whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time&mdash;counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;”’even if you do not violate the three-revert rule”’&mdash;should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page.<!– Template:uw-3rr –> [[User:Hemiauchenia|Hemiauchenia]] ([[User talk:Hemiauchenia|talk]]) 16:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

:Sorry I was in a middle of editing I was adding something else I didn’t realize u were also editing my apologies [[User:Judgejury28|Judgejury28]] ([[User talk:Judgejury28#top|talk]]) 16:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)

== [[Draft:Teddy Limoz|Teddy Limoz]] moved to draftspace ==

== [[Draft:Teddy Limoz|Teddy Limoz]] moved to draftspace ==

Your edit to Paddy Pimblett has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Cassiopeia talk 21:19, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are right my apologies. Judgejury28 (talk) 01:11, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, sportkeedaa and essential sports are not reliable sources, so please do not use those sources in Wikipedia. Regards. Cassiopeia talk 01:59, 14 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Judgejury28! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 2A02:C7C:4D0A:A500:C03:948B:7B92:45FB (talk) 06:38, 20 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Thilio. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ulric Bokeme without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Thilio^{R O B O T🤖 talk} 21:13, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Those opponents are not sourced so may you remove them please. Thank you Judgejury28 (talk) 21:35, 3 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. An edit war occurs when two or more users begin repeatedly reverting content on a page in a back-and-forth fashion to restore it back to how they think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree with their changes. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or undo the edits made by other editors when your changes are reverted. Instead, please use the talk page to work toward creating a version of the page that represents consensus among the editors involved. The best practice at this time is to stop editing the page and to discuss the disagreements, issues, and concerns at-hand with the other editors involved in the dispute. Wikipedia provides a page that helps to detail how this is accomplished. If discussions reach an impasse, you can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard, or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection while a discussion to resolve the dispute is ongoing.

Continuing to engage in further edit warring behavior can result in being blocked from editing Wikipedia—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor’s work—whether in whole or in part, or whether it involves the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also, please keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your demeanor, behavior, or conduct indicate that you intend to continue repeatedly making reverts to the page. Hemiauchenia (talk) 16:24, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was in a middle of editing I was adding something else I didn’t realize u were also editing my apologies Judgejury28 (talk) 16:26, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Teddy Limoz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 19:42, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]