User talk:Kitasenkyu2000: Difference between revisions

== The unblock request ==

== The unblock request ==

{{unblock|This account is not a sockpuppet on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)}} [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock|This account is not a sockpuppet on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)}} [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi, Yamla. Would like to inform you something if you see my unblock message. The account {{color|red|Kitasenkyu2000}} was really the only account I own because Sakuhara Metro and SKERQ872873 accounts are owned by someone else. Please forgive this and I wish you a happy vacation soon!

Hi, Yamla. Would like to inform you something if you see my unblock message. The account {{color|red|Kitasenkyu2000}} was really the only account I own because Sakuhara Metro and SKERQ872873 accounts are owned by someone else. Please forgive this and I wish you a happy vacation soon!

Hi. I wanted to let everyone know, this is for notices, not vandalism. If you would like to experiment, you can use your own sandboxes. Everyone can use the “Add Topic” function to post something here. Examples are:

Vandalism Warning #1/2/3/4/5/… etc…

Thank you. Kitasenkyu2000 (You are already here: Talkpage.)
The removal of this notice is prohibited.

Reminder: This is NOT a VANDALISM WARNING!

You seem to have created a list for editors which commit offences like vandalism on Wikipedia. While I understand you have good faith intentions, I highly recommend you not to do this. If you want to report users for administrators to deal with, we have a page for that called Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism or WP:AIV for short. We also have tools such as Twinkle and RedWarn, with tools like AntiVandal for when you get your hands on rollback rights like I do. We also have numerous pages to get you started on anti vandalism, such as Wikipedia:Cleaning up vandalism. fanfanboy (block_talk) 14:09, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your administrator prospects, however, you will not become an admin in December. Becoming an administrator requires far more experience, with most editors having thousands of edits and at least one year of editing. Plus, editors need a good knowledge of policy and decent experience in article creation. For more information, see Wikipedia:Administrators, Wikipedia:Requests for adminship, and Wikipedia:Administrator elections fanfanboy (block_talk) 14:13, 29 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Good links for me. I should take note of this. Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 01:07, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Being an Admin requires 30 days of experience and 500 edits? Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 01:08, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Correct, extended confirmed is the absolute minimum. In reality, becoming an admin requires far more experience. Adminship requires an editor to go through either requests for adminship (RfA for short), or administrator elections (AELECT for short), where the members of the English Wikipedia community will vote to either Support or Oppose your adminship request. Each voter will look through your contributions and other history on Wikipedia to determine if they think you will be a good fit for adminship. The standards you will be held to varies per editor, so don’t expect all editors to vote the same. A list of all adminship candidacies for both RfA and AELECT can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship by year if you want to see what the typical experience is for editors wanting adminship.

I will also tell you that even I would not pass RfA and AELECT even though I have been editing for 2 years and have over 5,000 edits. Numbers alone do not convince people here.

If you want to talk to a more experienced editor, I recommend contacting your mentor. You can find out who that is by clicking your username at the top right of the page, and looking for the “Mentor for editing” box on the right. If you do not have a mentor assigned to you, you can get one by clicking the blue “Get a mentor” button. Happy editing! fanfanboy (block_talk) 01:35, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Thank you!

As given in the “Apply RfA, it was known that “There is one who will surpass the RfA, but we must leave a statement, which people would be amazed at to get the most votes. Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 08:23, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The edits above are removed. Thank you! Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Kitasenkyu2000!

I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help. Has a list of maintenance tasks you can do.

Tips

• Don’t be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It’s normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don’t worry if you don’t understand everything at first—it’s fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue on the article’s talk page. Be civil, and don’t restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Hello Kitasenkyu2000! Your additions to Tokyu 5000 series have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license—to request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it’s important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (“) and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source’s wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file’s eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § Licensing.

It’s very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Please see your talk page on Commons for more information. Thank you. XtraJovial (talk • contribs) 19:23, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla (talk) 11:17, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Kitasenkyu2000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing “blocking administrator” with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This account is not a [[sockpuppet]] on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=This account is not a [[sockpuppet]] on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=This account is not a [[sockpuppet]] on Wikipedia and I do not abuse accounts. This account was NOT a sockpuppet as I do not own other accounts but only this one, Kitasenkyu2000. This account, not being a sockpuppet of SKERQ872873, has to be unblocked. [[User:Kitasenkyu2000|Kitasenkyu2000]] ([[User talk:Kitasenkyu2000#top|talk]]) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Kitasenkyu2000 (talk) 07:16, 4 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Yamla. Would like to inform you something if you see my unblock message. The account Kitasenkyu2000 was really the only account I own because Sakuhara Metro and SKERQ872873 accounts are owned by someone else. Please forgive this and I wish you a happy vacation soon!

FYI, please unblock me if you think the above statement is according to what you think this account should be unblocked.