User talk:LuniZunie: Difference between revisions

Line 306: Line 306:

[[User:Academic Neuro Fan|Academic Neuro Fan]] ([[User talk:Academic Neuro Fan|talk]]) [[User:Academic Neuro Fan|Academic Neuro Fan]] ([[User talk:Academic Neuro Fan|talk]]) 18:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

[[User:Academic Neuro Fan|Academic Neuro Fan]] ([[User talk:Academic Neuro Fan|talk]]) [[User:Academic Neuro Fan|Academic Neuro Fan]] ([[User talk:Academic Neuro Fan|talk]]) 18:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

:No. This is a [[WP:COI|Conflict of Interest issue]]. {{Linear-gradient text|#3066df|#e709c3|text=[[User:LuniZunie|”LuniZunie”]]|direction=right}} 18:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)

Hi and welcome. I noticed your reverts of vandalism on The Falling Man and thought I’d mentioned the Twinkle gadget to you. When you enable Twinkle, you can revert multiple consecutive edits by the same editor in a single click, instead of having to undo each one manually. You can also configure it to automatically open the talk page of the reverted editor and gives you a dropdown menu to select warnings. It has a lot of other features that you might find useful as well. Hope that helps! Schazjmd (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You made several changes in your contributions to the article John Meredith (folklorist).

• primarily inspired [[the Australian]] folk music revival will try and link to The Australian newspaper. The music revival is not related to the newspaper.

• recipient of an [[Australian literature|Australian Literature]] Fund Grant will go to Australian literature generally and does not mention the fund grant. Further the link is a duplicated phrase, as the page will be found with or without capitals.

Keep going with your editing, but remember to check context before accepting recommendations for linking.–Q8682 (talk) 04:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to whoever the following user is. I noticed the change for the Southwest high school (San Diego) wiki change. I would like to clarify that ALL mentioned things that you stated as “not reliable sources” has been proven and confirmed. I am a student from SOH and I wanted to add some things to the wiki to make it simpler. Hopefully this cuts some confusion. If your wondering about certain evidence like the community school thing, watch some of the KSOH videos that are linked in https://soh.sweetwaterschools.org/ for more information. the stadium modernization project is also displayed at the front of the furthest parking lot near tocayo Ave as more proof. Thank you and sorry for the confusion. Solarin18 (talk) 18:10, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I appreciate the comment however being a student at a school is not a credible source! I am very happy for you to cite the sources in your edits, but otherwise it sounds opinionated. Additionally, the part about electives reads more as an advertisement than fact. As for the case of the newspaper, I can see it has not been updated and that is fine, however since it was changed within other invalid edits it was removed. Happy editing! LuniZunie (talk) 18:13, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will try and see if the administration at my school can shine new light to this. If they provide any new information, I will ask you if you can try and find any resources (However might not be available if new) Solarin18 (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

specifically the wiki Solarin18 (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, as long as you have a valid source of information. Please refrain from writing sections that sound like a promotion however. LuniZunie (talk) 22:37, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have also redone the change of the newspaper. You may redo it if you wish. Solarin18 (talk) 22:38, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit will be kept. LuniZunie (talk) 22:41, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to replace the newspaper with the KSOH announcements (linking the channel behind the daily school announcements as well) Solarin18 (talk) 06:09, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am also hoping to talk to the teacher behind the KSOH class to see if he can promote the Wikipedia to hopefully have someone who’s experienced at this work to reform the entire wiki, with the addition of proper sources. If this does happen, and some mistakes are made, maybe you can help out with finding some of the missing resources??? I’m not sure yet, and I would have to ask the teacher on Monday. Solarin18 (talk) 06:16, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m hopeful you and whoever wants to take the job can work well together in making the SOH wiki better (a chance I may bring back the alumni, with a picture to prove the existence of it. Very unlikely since I’m not really skilled in editing lol) Solarin18 (talk) 06:18, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will keep this page in mind and will see what I can do about it in the near future. LuniZunie (talk) 12:33, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Just make sure your edits aren’t COI. LuniZunie (talk) 14:21, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated the Wikipedia Page including renaming it to Southwest High School (San Deigo, California). I looked at all your requests and did research on each. The school’s principal has not yet been officially updated, and the stadium renovation you mentioned was rejected (see https://www.demandstar.com/app/limited/bids/496827/details). I do request however that you do not make further edits on the page due to a WP:COI issue. The page will remain on my watchlist however, so I will update it as time goes on. Happy editing! LuniZunie (talk) 16:45, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The school’s principal is the same. Also there’s a slight error with the city name. You pronounced it as “San Deigo”. The proper pernounciation is “San Diego”. I just wanted to let you know that. I also talked to a friend who does the KSOH announcements to hopefully see if anyone would like to edit it and add proper sources. Solarin18 (talk) 17:59, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops lol that would be my dyslexia LuniZunie (talk) 18:11, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

KSOH should go live during period 5. I’ll come back here if they did mention the wikipedia. If not, No idea if anyone will want to completely refresh the ENTIRE wikipedia and update it. Solarin18 (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I hope whoever does take the job can do well. Solarin18 (talk) 18:19, 15 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If an editor continues to vandalize past their 4th warning, report them to WP:AIV. Repeatedly giving them a “final” warning won’t change anything, it may only embolden them. Thanks for your help. Lynch44 23:54, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve stopped giving final warnings, should I keep at least undoing edits though? LuniZunie (talk) 23:55, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free. Lynch44 23:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, will be remembered for future. Thank you! LuniZunie (talk) 23:57, 12 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Jacobin describes itself (on it’s own website & on it’s adequately sourced Wikipedia page) as “Socialist”.

The ‘Data and Society’ NGO was founded by the Microsoft Corporation & it’s biggest funders are the Open Society Foundation & various charitable foundations associated with the Soros, Gates, Ford, Carnegie families & numerous other left/liberal aligned entities https://datasociety.net/funder-list/.

This is material to the section edited since all the “criticism” comes from ideological opponents (& I would include myself in this group) of the person being criticized in the article.

Please share your specific objections to to my edit, so I may reformat & improve future edits?

Thnaks. 86.175.156.100 (talk) 20:55, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your questions. First of all, I just want to state that I may have been mistaken. I monitor the recent changes page, and your update was flagged so I looked at it. Your edit, at the time, seemed both poorly structured and, at least to me, seemed like a jab. However, I will admit these edits are looked at very fast as many updates happen per second. I’ve gone back and looked at it and the sentence structure still appears poor. On top of this, with you saying, “& I would include myself in this group”, I now worry that this is a COI issue. If I misunderstood, my apologies. LuniZunie (talk) 20:59, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not quite sure how updating Eric Ueland with well sourced biographical material including a recent assumption as acting Director of the Office of Government Ethics is not constructive or vandalism. You also made a second edit removing only the accurate and removing his middle name which can be found in my cited sources. I would appreciate it if we could note what exactly is vandalism and in the absence of notes revert to the original edits. Thanks.

Totallyawesomeuser (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Will get back to you soon. Have a lot of vandalism currently handling. LuniZunie (talk) 22:18, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies. Just looked at my edit, meant to warn you for unsourced additions. Sorry for the confusion, happy editing! LuniZunie (talk) 22:20, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of my additions were sourced. Am I free to revert to my edit? Totallyawesomeuser (talk) 22:25, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide the sources so I can check? LuniZunie (talk) 22:27, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://web.archive.org/web/20241117113413/https://www.benedictine.edu/academics/centers/constitutional/board

https://extapps2.oge.gov/201/Presiden.nsf/PAS+Index/A3F4147292E6433985258C61002C88E4/$FILE/Ueland%2C%20Eric%20M.%20%20final278.pdf

https://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_votes/vote1191/vote_119_1_00256.htm

https://web.archive.org/web/20250913193903/https://www.oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/News+Releases/AFDB5C8D408AF29885258CF2005F1D08

https://www.catholicherald.com/article/local/catholic-man-works-to-shine-spotlight-on-religious-oppression/

https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/1767/Eric_Matthew_Ueland.html

https://media.benedictine.edu/new-catholic-leaders-ready-to-take-on-the-world

https://www.legistorm.com/person/bio/201147/Brigid_E_Ueland.html

You can find where all the sources were located in the old revision: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eric_Ueland&oldid=1311173398

Let me know if any of my additions would need additional or alternative sources after the revision is reverted.

Thanks. Totallyawesomeuser (talk) 22:34, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, looks good. Apologies. LuniZunie (talk) 22:36, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They’ve done this to a sourced edit on Charles Eliot Norton’s page too.

Seems they don’t understand what vandalism is. 2600:1016:B103:C6DB:29D3:4696:B773:2F78 (talk) 22:38, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have failed to provide a source all three times I have asked. Additionally, another user made similar edits and was quickly blocked. LuniZunie (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It very obviously isn’t. Your actions here show you don’t understand what vandalism is. 2600:1016:B103:C6DB:29D3:4696:B773:2F78 (talk) 22:36, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Provide the sources then when editing. LuniZunie (talk) 22:37, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I did, but you kept removing it. Seems like you are just bothered with the edit for personal reasons. 2600:1016:B103:C6DB:29D3:4696:B773:2F78 (talk) 22:39, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“Thus, in the decade before the Civil War, Charles Eliot Norton supported the free soil position in order to “confine the Negro within the South.”10

Charles Eliot Norton to J.R Lowell, April 6 1855, as quoted from “Disowning Slavery” by Joanne Pope Melish published by Cornell University Press.

Get over yourself. 2600:1016:B103:C6DB:29D3:4696:B773:2F78 (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

api.pageplace.de/preview/DT0400.97815017202938_A30672938_A30637539/preview-978150172938_A30637539.pdf

You can read here. If you remove my edit once more you will be reported. 2600:1016:B103:C6DB:29D3:4696:B773:2F78 (talk) 22:45, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That link does not exist. You’re edits also appear subjective LuniZunie (talk) 22:47, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I was shocked it had its own article. 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:40, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Still vandalism dude LuniZunie (talk) 00:41, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“NoT pRoViDiNg A rElIaBlE sOuRcE”, maybe go read the screamer section of the jumpscare article? 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dude I can expand on the article some time if you want. It was also a MOS issue. LuniZunie (talk) 00:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. I’m not tryna turn it into an article ABOUT Internet screamers as a whole. 199.192.122.199 (talk) 00:54, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please go through WP:SECONDARY and WP:BLP before reverting again. 2A02:842A:40DD:F501:60B0:99A9:75C2:405C (talk) 19:47, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I had 3 people vandalizing at the same time and did not pay enough attention to your edits. Your warnings have been removed, and again I apologize for my mistake.  LuniZunie (talk) 19:51, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so I edited a page from a English Born And English raised cricketer who recently switched nationalities back from scotland to england I changed him to a English Cricketer before I got a Caution and Warning from this guy who is claiming i’m vandalising the page and he keeps changing his nationality to scottish I don’t know if he’s a scottish nationalist or something 82.19.141.45 (talk) 19:52, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It says he was born Scottish. It’s how he was born.  LuniZunie (talk) 19:53, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

he was born in dorset mate and he plays for england now so you’ve got the wrong info 82.19.141.45 (talk) 19:56, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I’ll revert it. I misread part of the edit and I’ll admit I’m not qualified enough to know what’s right. LuniZunie (talk) 19:58, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ok thank you Toweneditor (talk) 20:02, 14 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the “pending changes reviewer” userright, allowing you to review other users’ edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

Mz7 (talk) 23:47, 5 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! LuniZunie (talk) 17:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@LuniZunie Thanks for undoing your mistake against misunderstanding about vandalism.[1] 154.205.144.180 (talk) 19:55, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I read your edits too fast at first and realized they were fine after I undid them. LuniZunie (talk) 19:56, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand. Thank you for your hard work and defending Wikipedia from vandals. 154.205.144.180 (talk) 19:57, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi LuniZunie. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please keep the following things in mind while using rollback:

• Being granted rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle or Ultraviolet. It just adds a [rollback] button next to a page’s latest live revision. It does not grant you any additional “status” on Wikipedia, nor does it change how Wikipedia policies apply to you.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear and unambiguous cases of vandalism only. Never use rollback to revert good faith edits. For more information about when rollback is appropriate, see Wikipedia:Rollback § When to use rollback.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war, and it should never be used in a content-related dispute to restore the page to your preferred revision. If rollback is abused or used for this purpose or any other inappropriate purpose, the permission will be revoked.
• Use common sense. If you’re not sure about something, ask!

I’m sure you’ll do great with rollback, and feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into trouble or have any questions about appropriate use of rollback. If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I’ll remove it. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators’ guide/Rollback (even though you’re not an admin) and Wikipedia:Rollback. Good luck and thanks! Brandon (talk) 02:25, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

These [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plurality%20%28identity%29&diff=1315989463 edits] came directly from a long-standing source (attributed) 24.155.147.109 (talk) 21:01, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, this seems to have been a mistake on my part. Will remove your warning and will re-revert the edit. LuniZunie 21:02, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Right after you get rollback rights /sarcastically demeaning Flower (she/her; User talk:IPOfAFlower) 21:34, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

still learning how to use huggle 😔 LuniZunie 21:38, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Here’s a trout tho! All good, I was confused but it did seem like a mistake. 24.155.147.109 (talk) 21:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haha! Glad someone finally used the trout!! LuniZunie 21:06, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Mobile) I’Ve only had to use it twice and both times it was because of a bad rv/rb Flower (she/her; User talk:IPOfAFlower) 21:18, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, mistakes happen but luckily they seem rather rare. LuniZunie 21:20, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@ClaudineChionh That was definitely a first!! Very funny because I modeled my user page after seeing your user page while checking through a version history for a random article. LuniZunie 02:15, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, now that’s a first for me! ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · email · global) 02:17, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trouted

You have been trouted for: Vandalism on Wikipedia

They are definitely not WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia, so a report to WP:AIV wouldn’t be premature – I suggest we do that – in-house primate monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, good call. LuniZunie 17:11, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good news! They got blocked, however it seems as if they are going to sockpuppet based on a message on the talk page… LuniZunie 17:22, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m doing my Welcoming Committee duties; I’ll look out for vandalism or socks if I find any monkey_smashing^keyboards (talk) 17:23, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good revert, but the user who made that edit is a sockpuppet of a long-term sockfarm and will absolutely waste your time if given the opportunity. See the SPI here. fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 17:20, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice, will keep note. LuniZunie 17:21, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! LuniZunie 17:42, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The update on our page that you just reversed was requested by our current association President. He asked that we remove Notable Members & Contributions. Could you please reverse your removal? Thank you.

Academic Neuro Fan (talk) Academic Neuro Fan (talk) 18:40, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. This is a Conflict of Interest issue. LuniZunie 18:41, 10 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]