User talk:MaganMan: Difference between revisions

Line 86: Line 86:

:Hi @[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]], could you please describe what kind of references it lacks? [[User:MaganMan|MaganMan]] ([[User talk:MaganMan#top|talk]]) 12:15, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

::[[WP:IS|independent ones]] are lacking.[[User:Theroadislong|Theroadislong]] ([[User talk:Theroadislong|talk]]) 12:24, 21 September 2025 (UTC)

Hello MaganMan, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I’ve started a discussion about whether an article that you created, DNovo Group, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DNovo Group.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it’s not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BuySomeApples}}. And don’t forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BuySomeApples (talk) 19:52, 1 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@BuySomeApples: Thanks for tagging this. I want to improve the article but I’m not sure what’s missing to meet the standards. Could you point me to what specifically needs work — more reliable sources, more coverage, or something else? I’m happy to add and fix whatever is needed. MaganMan (talk) 22:34, 6 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Basically the main problem is that the company might not be notable enough to meet WP:GNG. If you can find significant coverage of DNovo Group, it might help. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:44, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MCE89 was:
The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

MCE89 (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaganMan!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MCE89 (talk) 02:43, 7 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @MCE89, thanks again for your earlier review and guidance. I’ve revised Draft:Neal Dolan with additional independent, peer-reviewed reviews of his book.

Would you be able to take another look when you have time? Much appreciated. MaganMan (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Neal Dolan.jpeg. You don’t seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image’s creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the “Edit” tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image’s description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. —ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 8 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Neil Dolan.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:00, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:DNovo Group logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 17:14, 11 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that drafts such as Draft:Michael D. Gurven are not allowed to be filed in categories, per WP:DRAFTNOCAT. The page must stay out of any categories while it’s in draft, and may be added to categories only if and when it’s been accepted and moved by an AFC reviewer. Since I’ve already had to remove the page from categories three times, do not put the page back into categories again, and note that there can be consequences for being disruptive if you continue. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 15:52, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bearcat, Sorry it was happened by mistake. Won’t happened again! MaganMan (talk) 16:09, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:41, 20 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]