User talk:Marcodicaprio: Difference between revisions

Line 90: Line 90:

([[User:DPL bot|Opt-out instructions]].) –[[User:DPL bot|DPL bot]] ([[User talk:DPL bot|talk]]) 08:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)

==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Human (Robbie Williams song)]]==

[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}

A tag has been placed on [[:Human (Robbie Williams song)]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]] and output must be carefully checked.

For further information, see the [[WP:CSD#G15|section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may ”’contest the nomination”’ by [[:Human (Robbie Williams song)|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines]]. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the [[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]].<!– Template:Db-llm-notice –><!– Template:CSD-warn –>

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Theme from the Persuaders cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under the non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of ‘file’ pages you have edited by clicking on the “my contributions” link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting “File” from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F6 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JJP_{Mas_ter} (she/they) 16:48, 21 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marcodicaprio! I noticed that you recently made an edit at Electronic rock and marked it as “minor”, but it may not have been. On Wikipedia, “minor edit” refers only to superficial edits that could never be disputed, such as fixing typos or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. MossOnALog^Talk 20:23, 23 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Fugs, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Godz and David Peel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Visions Vol 1 Lufthaus.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. —B-bot (talk) 02:48, 2 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya – you should make your statement (with a bolded Keep vote) on the project page, not the talk page. I’d move it for you but some people would see that as high handed! Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 14:49, 3 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Under the Radar Vol 3 Robbie Williams.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Commonwealth (The Beatles Song)

added links pointing to Two of Us and Can You Dig It?

Claus Theo Gärtner

added a link pointing to Der Alte

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Patar knight. I noticed that you have been adding short descriptions to articles. However, the short descriptions you added are too long to be effective, such as at The Palace of the King of the Birds. The guideline is that short descriptions should ideally be under 40 characters long, and no longer than needed. For more information, see the short description guidelines. If you have any questions, please let me know. Thank you. — Patar knight – ^chat/_{contributions} 09:18, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop using an LLM (such as ChatGPT) to generate articles wholesale like you’ve recently been doing. I’ve looked at a few that you’ve made and they are all very problematic, and will likely be reverted. Perryprog (talk) 16:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I use chatgpt to gather info but most of the articles are written and fixed by me. I think the articles should be kept because trout mask replica is an important album and the tracks should have wikipedia entries Marcodicaprio (talk) 16:08, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I always check if the info are correct and I fix the articles to see if everything is accurate. I use gtps only to gather information across the sources Marcodicaprio (talk) 16:11, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but what changes you have been doing to ChatGPT’s output is far from sufficient. You are clearly not fact checking anything it outputs, and the prose you’ve been adding all needs to be completely rewritten to comply with Wikipedia’s guidelines. Perryprog (talk) 16:12, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am fact checking everything indeed because I have those books about Beefheart Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:19, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m sorry, but I don’t believe you. In every single edit I’ve checked you’ve added multiple references to non-existent sources. You can’t fact check things if the sources, again, do not exist. Perryprog (talk) 18:30, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The sources about my articles on beefheart songs do exist. I often mention two books, Mike Barnes captain beefheart’s biography and John French, beefheart through the eyes of magic.

There’s another book that I own and I didn’t mention about all the songs in Trout Mask Replica by Francesco Nunziata in Italian, Captain Mask Replica. I even know personally the author, so you can’t say I’m lying. Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I forgot to mention the book by nunziata and to report other info in my articles indeed. So you can’t say I don’t check if the references are true or not Marcodicaprio (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This edit to Old Fart at Play has a link to All About Jazz to an article that doesn’t exist, and a quick search shows they’ve never had an article titled that, and it also has a link to a Guardian article that has never existed.
This edit to Hair Pie has a reference to “Hair Pie: Bake 1” which doesn’t seem to exist, though it’s hard to tell because none of the citations are made using citation templates.
This edit to Ant Man Bee has the same non-existent Guardian article, as well as an invalid ISBN for Barnes (2000).
This edit to Sugar ‘n Spikes references the same non-existent All About Jazz article and has an ISBN for French (2010) that’s for an unrelated book.
This edit to Trouble Every Day has multiple mistakes in its use of citation templates, a reference to Greene (2016) that fails verification, a reference to Lowe (2007) with a page number that is an entirely blank page, a reference to “Rough Trade” that doesn’t exist and which has a retrieved date of 2019.

Perryprog (talk) 20:05, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The article all about jazz exists https://www.allaboutjazz.com/trout-mask-replica__29404 and about the guardian, I don’t remember if I referenced the one that talked about Beefheart in general https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/nov/28/artist-captain-beefheart-paint-don-van-vliet Marcodicaprio (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think it’s an injustice that you deleted those articles because they disclose important information about those songs but if you don’t want to keep them, I don’t think I would repost or fix them because I spent a lot of time to gather information and check them. I’m sorry if there were some mistakes but they could’ve been fixed instead of deleting the entire articles Marcodicaprio (talk) 21:33, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I only undid one of your edits as I didn’t have the time to check over every single article, which you were creating sometimes as close as seven minutes apart. (Definitively not a long time.) I did report this on the AI Cleanup Noticeboard, however, where uninvolved editors will review your edits.

You are correct that the All About Jazz article did exist—I’m not sure why it didn’t show up in my search (a second check shows it much further down in the results than I checked), but that doesn’t change the fact that you blindly copied the incorrect URL from the LLM output indicating that you never actually checked that source. The same applies to the Guardian article “Mission: Unlistenable – Reappraising Captain Beefheart” —you repeatedly referenced this article, but it doesn’t exist.

The onus is not on me to spend hours fixing the dozens and dozens of articles you made every ten to twenty minutes apart. It’s even more frustrating that you’ve repeatedly lied to me saying, multiple times, that you checked all of your edits and their sources, which again you clearly have not. Perryprog (talk) 21:44, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah this user needs to be blocked and have all their articles deleted and probably most of their edits reverted. It’s all AI slop. There’s little moments where by some miracle a source he adds links up to something be said. But most of the time its like you say, stuff that doesn’t exist. He thinks he is doing a service by making a page for every Trout Mask Replica song ignoring the fact most influential albums on this site don’t even have pages for every song, since they aren’t notable enough on their own. Most of his sources pertain to the album or Beefheart’s career than actually talking about the songs in-depth.

I appreciate some of the improvements on the Faust pages since I noted those as pages I wanted to expand a while ago but there’s still so much problematic editing going on here. And this user is not going through books and fact-checking or gathering sources organically to avoid this disruptive editing. Aradicus77 (talk) 12:19, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

i think what you said that I deserve to be blocked is highly disrespectful to my person and my work. I put all the articles related to trout mask replica in the draft because I need to fix them. But it’s not ai slop because I’m an expert in the subject. So please, talk to me in a respectful way because I never insulted anybody Marcodicaprio (talk) 21:54, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I even found the date of death of dutch composer tom dissevelt through careful archival and sourced research so my work focuses on giving coverage to electronic and experimental music with dedication and care. Marcodicaprio (talk) 22:14, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hair Pie. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit the draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 21:29, 9 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve moved Bills Corpse to Draft:Bills Corpse for the same reason. Please stop making articles using AI until you have shown you understand Wikipedia’s relevant content policies, such as WP:V, WP:OR (and in particular WP:SYNTH), WP:N, and WP:MOS. Such articles are considered disruptive and may result in loss of editing priveliges. lp0 on fire () 08:50, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I used ai to gather more info but I checked the article by myself, I m not copying and pasting without checking Marcodicaprio (talk) 12:18, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will re write the articles then but all the information is correct and verified Marcodicaprio (talk) 12:20, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not enough to verify that the information is accurate; there are many other policies that content must conform to. For example, weasel words must be avoided. Until you are familiar with how to follow most of these policies yourself, you are not considered competent to check that AI is following them lp0 on fire () 14:58, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the clarification about weasel words. I will re-write the article about Beefheart by myself, now I just put them in draft Marcodicaprio (talk) 15:56, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was just an example; there are many Wikipedia policies and guidelines that LLMs don’t understand. I’d recommend familiarising yourself with all relevant parts of WP:List of guidelines; in particular the content and style guidelines. lp0 on fire () 16:04, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’d recommend not touching LLMs. They’re more trouble than they’re worth and their use really ought to be banned. Cremastra (talk · contribs) 16:27, 10 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Hip-hop

added a link pointing to Trouble Every Day

The Palace of the King of the Birds

added a link pointing to Let It Be

Watching Rainbows

added a link pointing to Let It Be

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 08:03, 14 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Human (Robbie Williams song) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, as it exhibits signs of having been generated by an AI model with no clear human review. Text produced by these applications can be unsuitable for an encyclopedia and output must be carefully checked.
For further information, see the section G15 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think these signs were incorrectly identified and you assert that you did carefully check the content, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. Additionally – if you would like to create an article but find it difficult, please ask for help at the Teahouse.

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply