User talk:Marius Ursei: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Content deleted Content added


 

Line 45: Line 45:

:::https://adevarul.ro/stiri-interne/evenimente/accident-in-marea-neagra-un-marinar-cu-degetele-2437717.html

:::https://adevarul.ro/stiri-interne/evenimente/accident-in-marea-neagra-un-marinar-cu-degetele-2437717.html

:::Some o them have wikipedia en pages… so i think they are reliable sources 🙂 [[User:Marius Ursei|Marius Ursei]] ([[User talk:Marius Ursei#top|talk]]) 18:33, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

:::Some o them have wikipedia en pages… so i think they are reliable sources 🙂 [[User:Marius Ursei|Marius Ursei]] ([[User talk:Marius Ursei#top|talk]]) 18:33, 19 November 2025 (UTC)

::::Can you use these sources in the article about financiarul? I will ask if there are any other reviewers that can better respond (being able to read Romanian, etc). You can re-submit the draft for review to get another opinion. — [[User:Reconrabbit|<span style=”color:#4E8321″>Recon</span>]][[User talk:Reconrabbit|<span class=”skin-invert” style=”color:#073131″>rabbit</span>]] 18:42, 19 November 2025 (UTC)


Latest revision as of 18:42, 19 November 2025

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Reconrabbit were:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources cannot be found and do not meet the minimum standard for inline citations. The text of this draft reads as though it was created by a large language model, which is inappropriate for publication.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

Reconrabbit 17:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Marius Ursei!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Reconrabbit 17:21, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, i am the owner of the website financiarul.ro. i have a romanian page in wikipedia https://ro.wikipedia.org/wiki/Financiarul
What better source do you need?
I can prove evrething and answer any questions Marius Ursei (talk) 17:48, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The English Wikipedia has different standards than other language Wikipedia sites. It is not enough to prove that the company exists. It has to be notable according to our policies, with independent, signficant coverage from reliable sources that are cited in line with the text it supports. — Reconrabbit 18:00, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
We are independent, not politically affiliated in any way. We have NEVER promoted a politician and I leave below reliable sources that quote financiarul.ro
https://www.realitatea.net/stiri/lifestyle/ce-le-facea-maria-tereza-barbatilor-cu-care-se-iubea-legendele-infioratoare-ale-unui-castel-superb_5dcc924d406af85273d59c5a
https://hotnews.ro/valeriu-tabara-si-mitul-consumatorului-suferind-701168
https://ziare.com/bucuresti/imobiliare/bucurestiul-va-avea-prima-cladire-inteligenta-in-2008-350473
https://www.capital.ro/1200-buletinul-de-stiri-capital-informatiile-economice-ale-orei-121272.html
https://www.gandul.ro/actualitate/asistenta-lui-alfred-bulai-audiata-ca-martor-in-dosarul-fostului-profesor-de-la-snspa-a-facut-primul-studiu-romanesc-privind-capitalul-erotic-20283405
https://www.economica.net/pareri-despre-kruk-romania-din-care-inveti-cum-sa-ajungi-rapid-la-zero-datorii_570731.html
https://www.stiripesurse.ro/comercian-ii-de-produse-articole-care-dezinformeaza-consumatorii-sco-i-de-pe-pia-a_989897.html
https://adevarul.ro/stiri-interne/evenimente/accident-in-marea-neagra-un-marinar-cu-degetele-2437717.html
Some o them have wikipedia en pages… so i think they are reliable sources 🙂 Marius Ursei (talk) 18:33, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Can you use these sources in the article about financiarul? I will ask if there are any other reviewers that can better respond (being able to read Romanian, etc). You can re-submit the draft for review to get another opinion. — Reconrabbit 18:42, 19 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Exit mobile version