User talk:Marquardtika: Difference between revisions

 

Line 162: Line 162:

:Probably best to discuss content issues at [[Talk:Jason Miyares]]. I took a look at recent removals and it looks like some promotional stuff was removed. I don’t see a problem. What specific content are you looking to re-add? Can you re-write it in a more neutral fashion and ensure that it is covered in independent sources? [[User:Marquardtika|Marquardtika]] ([[User talk:Marquardtika#top|talk]]) 16:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

:Probably best to discuss content issues at [[Talk:Jason Miyares]]. I took a look at recent removals and it looks like some promotional stuff was removed. I don’t see a problem. What specific content are you looking to re-add? Can you re-write it in a more neutral fashion and ensure that it is covered in independent sources? [[User:Marquardtika|Marquardtika]] ([[User talk:Marquardtika#top|talk]]) 16:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

All of it was independently sourced by reliable sources. The housing settlement was argued by the AG Office, the largest in the state’s history, makes no sense to remove it. The job fairs and veteran clinics are ongoing, not a one time affair. The drug prosecutions from the AG Office have caused VA tto have the strongest drug related death decline in the country. I guess I’ll just add it back trimmed with another source(s). [[Special:Contributions/216.103.177.73|216.103.177.73]] ([[User talk:216.103.177.73|talk]]) 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

All of it was independently sourced by reliable sources. The housing settlement was argued by the AG Office, the largest in the state’s history, makes no sense to remove it. The job fairs and veteran clinics are ongoing, not a one time affair. The drug prosecutions from the AG Office have caused VA tto have the strongest drug related death decline in the country. I guess I’ll just add it back trimmed with another source(s). [[Special:Contributions/216.103.177.73|216.103.177.73]] ([[User talk:216.103.177.73|talk]]) 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

== Administrators’ noticeboard – Arabella ==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]] There is currently a discussion at [[Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents]] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.<!–Template:Discussion notice–><!–Template:ANI-notice–>[[User:Julian in LA|Julian in LA]] ([[User talk:Julian in LA|talk]]) 23:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)

Per the Tony Evers page, you would make it easier for other editors if you found alternate sources to official sources that you disagree with rather than deleting factual content. If you disagree with a source, it is best just to Google it and find if there are other (in this case, many) alternative sources rather than deleting the item entirely. GoldCoastPrior (talk) 18:11, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Or you could just add WP:RS in the first place…Marquardtika (talk) 20:29, 17 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

—Rosiestep (talk) 14:50, 30 July 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Edward Blum (activist). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users’ edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article’s talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. DonIago (talk) 14:31, 5 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marquardtika, I recently created an article draft for Katie Haun, a female venture capitalist and former federal prosecutor. Since you’re a member of the WP:WOMRED, I hope you’ll be willing to take a look – the draft can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Yaltaha29/Katie_Haun_draft. If you feel it’s ready, I’d welcome your help in moving it to the mainspace. Thank you so much! Yaltaha29 (talk) 14:14, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will take a look. Marquardtika (talk) 15:22, 11 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, thank you for all the good work you’re doing! I wanted to ask if the newly created Charlotte Kates article has been copied/translated from somewhere else at all? Just that some of the references have “retrieved” dates from last year. Thanks. –Kj cheetham (talk) 11:21, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, yes, I took some of it from Samidoun and forgot to attribute that. Any guidance on what I should do to address that? Thank you. Marquardtika (talk) 15:17, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you’ve copied actual text and not just references, I’d recommend taking a look at WP:RIA and doing a dummy edit with text as the edit summary. Hope this helps. –Kj cheetham (talk) 15:30, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is helpful, thank you–I’ll fix this shortly. Marquardtika (talk) 15:31, 13 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | September 2025, Vol 11, Issue 9, Nos. 326, 327, 347, 348, 349 Recognized as the most active, topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: Announcements: Tip of the Month: Researching historical women writers who used pseudonyms requires careful investigation across multiple sources, as many women adopted pen names to avoid gender bias and judgment (e.g., being labeled a bluestocking) and, ultimately, to get published. Progress (“moving the needle”): Other ways to participate:

—Rosiestep (talk) 23:54, 31 August 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page NGO Monitor, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A bare URL and missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 18:51, 5 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | October 2025, Vol 11, Issue 10, Nos. 326, 327, 350, 351, 352 Recognized as the most active topic-based WikiProject by human changes. Online events: Announcements: Tip of the Month: Notable does not always mean admirable; you don’t have to like an article’s subject to make the article a useful contribution to Wikipedia. Progress (“moving the needle”): Statistics available via various tools: previously, Humaniki tool; currently, QLever. Thank you if you contributed one or more of the 6,283 articles during this period: 19 May 2025: 20.114% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,066,280; 415,618 women) 24 September 2025: 20.20% of EN-WP biographies are about women (2,088,533 biographies; 421,901 women) Other ways to participate:

—Rosiestep (talk) 18:31, 29 September 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

I undid an item you reverted and published before I entered the reason — I did put it on the talk page. here is the reason: == Inclusion of attack ads ==
I propose including a short, neutrally written section on “Political attacks / Attack ads.” These ads are covered in reliable sources such as the Akron Beacon Journal, Cleveland.com, Ohio Capital Journal, Washington Post, and New York Times. Because Sykes represents a highly competitive district, repeated negative advertising campaigns have drawn significant press attention and are part of her documented political history. The content will be framed neutrally: who aired the ads, what claims they made, and how independent sources evaluated them. This follows precedent in other congressional biographies and aligns with WP:DUE, WP:V, and WP:NPOV. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TruthIsCurious (talk • contribs) 11:03, 2 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. 81567518W (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there,

You’ve put several welcome messages on my talk pages over the years. My IP bounces quite a bit and mostly contribute to Virginia state politics and some federal politics and election results.

Anyway, a user removed a lot of content off Jason Miyares’s page (some of it you welcomed me / thanked me for) and I was wondering if you could look at it and replace the things you find unfair for removal. Some of it makes absolutely no sense to me like getting rid of the elder abuse initiative the first for metro Richmond that the AG office set up or the lastgest housing settlement ever secured in Virginia by the AG Office.

I’d like an independent look at it. I think the page is getting a lot of traction after the Jay Jones scandal and users and turning to Miyares now unfairly. 216.103.177.73 (talk) 16:13, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Probably best to discuss content issues at Talk:Jason Miyares. I took a look at recent removals and it looks like some promotional stuff was removed. I don’t see a problem. What specific content are you looking to re-add? Can you re-write it in a more neutral fashion and ensure that it is covered in independent sources? Marquardtika (talk) 16:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of it was independently sourced by reliable sources. The housing settlement was argued by the AG Office, the largest in the state’s history, makes no sense to remove it. The job fairs and veteran clinics are ongoing, not a one time affair. The drug prosecutions from the AG Office have caused VA tto have the strongest drug related death decline in the country. I guess I’ll just add it back trimmed with another source(s). 216.103.177.73 (talk) 16:47, 9 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators’ noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.Julian in LA (talk) 23:35, 17 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]