{{unblock reviewed|decline=You appear to have used an AI to draft this unblock request. We want to hear from you, not an AI. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 15:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)|reason=To the Wikipedia Administrators,
{{unblock reviewed|decline=You appear to have used an AI to draft this unblock request. We want to hear from you, not an AI. [[User:PhilKnight|PhilKnight]] ([[User talk:PhilKnight|talk]]) 15:31, 10 September 2025 (UTC)|reason=To the Wikipedia Administrators,
Dear Wikipedia Team,
Kindly note that Since I’m in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won’t happen in future as I’ll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest.
I am writing to sincerely apologize for my recent actions on Wikipedia. I understand I did multiple links, which I now realize was a mistake and goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines.
I am writing to sincerely apologize for my recent actions on Wikipedia. I understand I did multiple links, which I now realize was a mistake and goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines.
Thank you for your time and consideration. [[User:Mathscircle|Mathscircle]] ([[User talk:Mathscircle#top|talk]]) 05:42, 9 September 2025 (UTC)}}
Thank you for your time and consideration. [[User:Mathscircle|Mathscircle]] ([[User talk:Mathscircle#top|talk]]) 05:42, 9 September 2025 (UTC)}}
To any administrator considering this unblock request; The above text in the unblock request was AI/LLM generated. I think doing such text an unblock demonstrates a lack of understanding of our principles. I would not unblock given this request. To Mathscircle; please, we want to hear from ”you”, not from a bot. If we wanted to hear from a bot, we wouldn’t need humans to review block requests, and there wouldn’t be any problematic editors, such as you have been doing with overlinking. Please don’t use AI/LLMs in this way. Thank you, –[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 16:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
To any administrator considering this unblock request; The above text in the unblock request was AI/LLM generated. I think doing such text an unblock demonstrates a lack of understanding of our principles. I would not unblock given this request. To Mathscircle; please, we want to hear from ”you”, not from a bot. If we wanted to hear from a bot, we wouldn’t need humans to review block requests, and there wouldn’t be any problematic editors, such as you have been doing with overlinking. Please don’t use AI/LLMs in this way. Thank you, –[[User:Hammersoft|Hammersoft]] ([[User talk:Hammersoft|talk]]) 16:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
Kindly note that Since I’m in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won’t happen in future as I’ll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest.
Hi Mathscircle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 10:28, 17 May 2025 (UTC)
Pro-anti-air (talk) 05:15, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
- Kindly accept my sincere apologies. I will not repeat this mistake and will be more careful with my edits in the future. Mathscircle (talk) 12:07, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance.
Thank you. Mellk (talk) 13:17, 23 July 2025 (UTC)
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits are frequently wrong, with inaccurate edit summaries. Please stop. Greenman (talk) 19:09, 31 July 2025 (UTC)
Why do many your recent edits in the last few days violate MOS:OVERLINK? One doesn’t link months, the word school in the name of an unlinked school, years, numbers, everyday words, and pretty everything else you’ve linked recently. Can you please revert these? Thanks Nfitz (talk) 06:33, 14 August 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Mathscircle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
To the Wikipedia Administrators,
Dear Wikipedia Team,
Kindly note that Since I’m in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won’t happen in future as I’ll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest.
I am writing to sincerely apologize for my recent actions on Wikipedia. I understand I did multiple links, which I now realize was a mistake and goes against Wikipedia’s guidelines.
I made a silly mistake while editing, which I deeply regret. I am a new user and I’m still learning the proper way to contribute to the platform. I promise to be more careful in the future and to abide by all rules and regulations.
I humbly request that you unblock my account and give me another chance to contribute positively to the communityMathscircle (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Mathscircle (talk) 07:51, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
- AI generated unblock request. If it were me, I’d decline this unblock request on those grounds alone. —Hammersoft (talk) 14:08, 10 September 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia is a collaborative project. We progress forward by working together, taking into account Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and Wikipedia:Manual of Style. In your five months of editing here, you have not once responded to concerns raised here on your talk page. While you are not required to respond, continuing to edit in what appear to be problematic ways when people raise the issues is not acceptable. You were cautioned about violating MOS:OVERLINK three weeks ago, and chose to ignore that issue. Today, you were told there is a WP:AN/I issue involving you. If you’d read that, you would know it was about violating MOS:OVERLINK again. Despite that, you continue to edit in violation of MOS:OVERLINK. As a result, I have partially blocked you on this project from editing any mainspace articles until such time as you respond, agree to operate within the bounds of MOS:OVERLINK and in the future respond to people’s concerns about your editing. You are free to edit areas other than mainspace articles, including responding at Wikipedia:Administrators’_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Mathscircle_reported_by_User:Mvcg66b3r. If you have questions, let me know. —Hammersoft (talk) 14:07, 8 September 2025 (UTC)
This user’s unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Mathscircle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am a young student who is new to editing on Wikipedia and am still learning the ropes. I was not fully aware of all the guidelines and policies, which led to my account being blocked.
I sincerely apologize for my mistakes and assure you that I have taken the time to review the rules and now understand them better. I am committed to following all Wikipedia guidelines and contributing constructively to the community.
I would be grateful if you would consider unblocking my account and giving me another chance to learn and contribute in a more responsible manner.
Thank you for your time and consideration. Mathscircle (talk) 05:42, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Decline reason:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To any administrator considering this unblock request; The above text in the unblock request was AI/LLM generated. I think doing such text an unblock demonstrates a lack of understanding of our principles. I would not unblock given this request. To Mathscircle; please, we want to hear from you, not from a bot. If we wanted to hear from a bot, we wouldn’t need humans to review block requests, and there wouldn’t be any problematic editors, such as you have been doing with overlinking. Please don’t use AI/LLMs in this way. Thank you, —Hammersoft (talk) 16:31, 9 September 2025 (UTC)
Dear Wikipedia Team,
Kindly note that Since I’m in my learning phase in wikipedia, I was not fully aware of all the wikipedia rules and regulations due to which this error happened, Sincerely apologies for the same. Also ensuring this won’t happen in future as I’ll be contributing more in a very responsible manner by adhereing wikipedia guidelines. Hope you will consider this request and do the needful at the earliest.
