:Hello!
:Hello!
:I do not have a paid relationship with this person. I was meeting with him recently and was trying to research beforehand, and noticed there was not a wikipedia page. I am definitely not paid and don’t have an affiliation. [[User:Melgradydias|Melgradydias]] ([[User talk:Melgradydias#top|talk]]) 18:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
:I do not have a paid relationship with this person. I was meeting with him recently and was trying to research beforehand, and noticed there was not a wikipedia page. I am definitely not paid and don’t have an affiliation. [[User:Melgradydias|Melgradydias]] ([[User talk:Melgradydias#top|talk]]) 18:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Edmund F. Murphy III|Edmund F. Murphy III]] (September 24) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by Bonadea were:
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission’s references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ”significant” coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ”published”, [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|”reliable”]], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|”secondary”]] sources that are ”[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]” of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!–
–>{{divbox|gray|3=Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a [[large language model]], such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:<br />
* [[WP:NOTPROMO|Promotional tone]], [[MOS:EDITORIAL|editorializing]] and other [[WP:WTW|words to watch]]
* [[WP:VAGUE|Vague]], generic, and [[WP:CRYSTAL|speculative statements]] extrapolated from similar subjects
* [[WP:NOTESSAY|Essay-like writing]]
* [[Hallucination (artificial intelligence)|Hallucinations]] (plausible-sounding, but false information) and [[WP:FAKE|non-existent references]]
* [[WP:Close paraphrasing|Close paraphrasing]]<br />
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See [[Wikipedia:Large language models|our help page on large language models]].|}}<!–
—
–> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Sources fall into three categories: nonexistent (presumably LLM hallucinations), primary/non-independent, and passing mentions of his name. None of them meets the sourcing requirements.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Edmund F. Murphy III]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Edmund_F._Murphy_III ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bonadea&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Edmund_F._Murphy_III ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
”[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]” <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 18:56, 24 September 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
{| style=”margin: 0.4em 2em;”
|- style=”vertical-align: top;”
| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]]
| <div style=”background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;”>Hello, ”’Melgradydias”’!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the ”'[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]”’. If you have any ”other” questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the ”'[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]”’, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ”[[User:Bonadea|bonadea]]” <small>[[Special:Contributions/Bonadea|contributions]] [[User talk:Bonadea|talk]]</small> 18:56, 24 September 2025 (UTC)</div>
|}<!– Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation –>
[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]
Hello Melgradydias. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia’s mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a “black hat” practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Melgradydias. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Melgradydias|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 18:52, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- Hello!
- I do not have a paid relationship with this person. I was meeting with him recently and was trying to research beforehand, and noticed there was not a wikipedia page. I am definitely not paid and don’t have an affiliation. Melgradydias (talk) 18:54, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Sources fall into three categories: nonexistent (presumably LLM hallucinations), primary/non-independent, and passing mentions of his name. None of them meets the sourcing requirements.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
 |
Hello, Melgradydias!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 18:56, 24 September 2025 (UTC) |
