User talk:Mogulsfn: Difference between revisions

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Snow in Australia, have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it’s wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you’d like to experiment with the wiki’s syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! HiLo48 (talk) 07:48, 9 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t remove content again from Snow in Australia without first gaining consensus to do so on the article’s Talk page. The content you have now twice removed is well sourced. Debating whether it should be there in Edit summaries is a pointless exercise. HiLo48 (talk) 01:13, 13 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hilo48, Excuse me champ but regarding the snow decline each year of 0.4 to 0.6cm or what ever it was, there is no stated source of where that info is from and it’s probably quite frankly not true so if it’s gonna be on there at least add a bloody source of where it’s from Mogulsfn (talk) 21:43, 28 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The CSIRO source says “downward trends of about 0.4-0.6 cm per year over the past 70 years.” HiLo48 (talk) 01:38, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How can you believe the CSIRO it’s government funded these orginsations are gonna do what ever they can to sell the climate change scam and the governments renewables Mogulsfn (talk) 02:05, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh dear. The CSIRO is an incredibly highly regarded organisation globally. If your argument depends on saying it can’t be trusted, you don’t have an argument. HiLo48 (talk) 02:21, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not saying they can’t be trusted just saying i don’t think they are highly accurate Mogulsfn (talk) 02:27, 29 September 2025 (UTC)[reply]