User talk:Mohamed0612: Difference between revisions

Line 24: Line 24:

:::::Hi {{u|R Prazeres}}, thank you so much for the helpful advice and for taking the time to guide me. I really appreciate it. I’ve just tried to apply your tips by creating a new article for [[Mohamed Métalsi]], focusing on reliable sources and proper formatting from the start. I would value your feedback on it whenever you have a moment. Cheers! [[User:Mohamed0612|Mohamed0612]] ([[User talk:Mohamed0612#top|talk]]) 18:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)

::::::Hi Mohamed0612, I’m glad it was helpful. I’ll have a look at [[Mohamed Métalsi]] and I’ll leave some minor suggestions for improvement (mainly about ensuring appropriate citations where needed). You can address them when you have the time. Mariamnei’s feedback below is also helpful for general advice on future articles. Happy editing! [[User:R Prazeres|R Prazeres]] ([[User talk:R Prazeres|talk]]) 19:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)

[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Hello, I’m [[User:HurricaneZeta|HurricaneZeta]]. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a [[large language model]] (an “[[AI chatbot]]” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually [[Wikipedia:Large language models#Risks and relevant policies|unsuitable for an encyclopedia]], and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read [[WP:RS|reliable sources]] and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you want to practice editing, please use [[User:Mohamed0612/sandbox|your sandbox]]. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User talk:HurricaneZeta|my talk page]]. Thanks.[[Category:User talk pages with large language model notices|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!– Template:uw-ai1 –> [[User:HurricaneZeta|”’Hurricane”']][[User talk:HurricaneZeta|”’Zeta”']][[Special:Contributions/HurricaneZeta|C]] 01:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)

== I have sent you a note about a page you started ==

Hello, Mohamed0612. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:07, 28 December 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Chouara Tannery, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. Please also ensure that your edit summaries are accurate and not misleading, as your recent ones were. Lastly, please make sure you are not using AI or machine-generated text for your edits. If you have further questions, feel free to ask me here in response to this message, or leave a comment on the talk page of an article where you need help. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 17:53, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mohamed0612: please make sure you read the message above before you continue editing. This is the third time you’ve made an edit involving massive deletion of content with a nonsensical explanation. R Prazeres (talk) 17:57, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi R Prazeres, thank you for the feedback and for the warning. I apologize for the issues caused by my recent edits.

I am a local from Fes and I’m very passionate about improving the articles related to my city. However, I am still learning the complexities of Wikitext and Infobox parameters, so I used some AI assistance to help me with the “coding” and restructuring part. I see now that this led to massive, unintentional deletions of content and misleading edit summaries. It was a mistake on my part to rely on the tool for restructuring without double-checking the deletions, and I didn’t mean to “overwrite” your hard work or the existing citations.

I truly admire the photos and the effort you’ve put into the Fes articles. I will follow your advice and use my sandbox for any major changes from now on, and I will stick to manual, smaller edits to ensure I don’t cause any more technical or content issues. Thank you for your patience while I learn the ropes here. Mohamed0612 (talk) 18:09, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohamed0612, thanks for responding and understanding. A piece of advice: to avoid these problems and to ensure that your edits are constructive, especially while you’re still learning, I suggest you focus on making smaller edits and focus on adding any missing information (as opposed to rewriting or removing existing content). This is especially important for articles that are already well-cited. And of course, make sure that any additions are cited with reliable sources that provide the information you’re adding (have a look at the blue link to see what “reliable” means). If you use AI tools, please use them for superficial things such as fixing grammar mistakes; not for generating new content. I hope this helps. Let me know if you have any further questions. Cheers, R Prazeres (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi R Prazeres, thank you so much for the helpful advice and for taking the time to guide me. I really appreciate it. I’ve just tried to apply your tips by creating a new article for Mohamed Métalsi, focusing on reliable sources and proper formatting from the start. I would value your feedback on it whenever you have a moment. Cheers! Mohamed0612 (talk) 18:46, 2 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohamed0612, I’m glad it was helpful. I’ll have a look at Mohamed Métalsi and I’ll leave some minor suggestions for improvement (mainly about ensuring appropriate citations where needed). You can address them when you have the time. Mariamnei’s feedback below is also helpful for general advice on future articles. Happy editing! R Prazeres (talk) 19:44, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m HurricaneZeta. An edit that you recently made seemed to be generated using a large language model (an “AI chatbot” or other application using such technology). Text produced by these applications is usually unsuitable for an encyclopedia, and may contain factually inaccurate statements, fictitious citations, or other problems. You should instead read reliable sources and then summarize those in your own words. Your edit may have been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. HurricaneZeta^C 01:11, 6 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mohamed0612. Thank you for your work on Le360. Another editor, Mariamnei, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for your work on this article. Please add more sources – primarily secondary sources – and footnotes to back up each claim with a reliable source. Please also establish notability as per WP:NCORP. Thanks and have a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Mariamnei}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Mariamnei (talk) 09:54, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei: Hi there, and thank you for reviewing the article.

To give you some context, I created this entry by translating and adapting the existing article from the French Wikipedia, as Le360 is a major digital outlet in Morocco that was missing from the English encyclopedia. I understand your points regarding WP:NCORP and the need for independent secondary sources. Finding English-language coverage for local Moroccan media can be challenging, but I am currently searching for reports from international organizations (like RSF or HRW) to better establish its notability. I will leave the maintenance tags for now and work on improving the citations gradually. Thanks again for your guidance! Mohamed Filali (talk) 10:06, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I will remind you that sources do not need to be in English; French sources can also be used. Have a wonderful day! Mariamnei (talk) 10:22, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

@Mariamnei: Thanks again for the clarification! I have acted on your advice and significantly updated the article using high-quality French and Spanish secondary sources (such as Le Monde, Libération, and El Confidencial) instead of the unstable English ones. These sources cover the subject in depth—including ownership, controversies, and legal disputes—which should now firmly establish its notability per WP:NCORP. I believe the verification issues are now resolved. Thanks for guiding me in the right direction! Mohamed Filali (talk) 10:40, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

It looks better. Thanks and have a great day! Mariamnei (talk) 14:28, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Casanearshore, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source’s actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Done. I have fixed the generic name errors in the citations by standardizing the author parameters and converting institutional references to plain text to resolve the bot warning. Thanks for the heads-up! Mohamed Filali (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2026 (UTC)[reply]

Must Read

Leave a Comment Cancel Reply

Leave a Comment