User talk:Monika Helgesson: Difference between revisions

Hi Monika Helgesson! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GoingBatty (talk). We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Monika Helgesson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don’t hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you’re interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

Erick (talk) 20:15, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Otro Día Lluvioso (Juhn, Lenny Tavárez and Becky G song), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization’s website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia’s content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation‘s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 15:35, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Fulanito (Becky G and El Alfa song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 06:34, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 22:50, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I see you’re getting a lot of warnings in relation to the song articles you’re creating. They are not meeting our standards. If you have questions about our standards, ask, and we’ll teach you. But ignoring them is not an option. Any more, and your account will be temporarily blocked from editing, so please take this to heart. Thanks.

(Side note: The standards songs need to meet us at WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.)

Sergecross73 msg me 02:58, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people’s comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Fulanito (Becky G and El Alfa song). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 13:22, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Que Me Baile has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Binksternet (talk) 13:51, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Becky G while logged out. Wikipedia’s policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. You have been using the Lithuanian IP Special:Contributions/78.63.196.37 on the same articles as your registered username. See the extensive user interaction history. Binksternet (talk) 17:06, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Que Le Muerda, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a “See also” section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled “Contest this speedy deletion”. This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ––FormalDude talk 14:16, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, La Loto, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 20:59, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Días Lluviosos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Días Lluviosos, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can’t be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I’ve moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of “Draft:” before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia’s general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 14:54, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New New (song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 29#New New (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 23:18, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Do It (Empire Cast song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 30#Do It (Empire Cast song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 00:07, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Latina (song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 4#Latina (song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 15:22, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article They Ain’t Ready (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

poorly referenced page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 14:06, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Latina (Reykon song) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 31#Latina (Reykon song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:54, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to La Respuesta, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 19:13, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove WP:Discussions, as you did at Latina (Reykon song)—Richhoncho (talk) 21:23, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Amantes (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable song

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article’s talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jax 0677 (talk) 17:13, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I don’t know why you moved Draft:Joss Favela into the main article space, but please don’t. It has only two citations, with the vast majority of the content unreferenced, which is unacceptable for any article, and especially so for articles on living people. I have moved it back to drafts. — DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Días Lluviosos, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Splitting. If you split an article you MUST provide attribution. —Muhandes (talk) 01:00, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! Muhandes (talk) 01:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Un mundo ideal, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tollens (talk) 18:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Becky G, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A “bare URL and missing title” error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:26, 28 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Karol G into Karol G discography. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia’s content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia’s licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you’ve copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:16, 6 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Coming Your Way. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is too soon.
Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 16:35, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you recently removed content from List of Televisa original productions in 2020s without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don’t worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 21:02, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Telenovelafan215. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Leonardo Daniel, but you didn’t provide a reliable source. It’s been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, “Coming Your Way“.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:08, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Karol G discography, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TGQ. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It’s OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, —DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Everything Or Nothing. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit for review” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JJP_Master (she/they) 22:43, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monika Helgesson. Thank you for your work on Bazooka (song). Another editor, Hey man im josh, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

The song is not mentioned at the target, making it a misleading redirect. It should be mentioned there in order to avoid it being sent to WP:RFD.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hey man im josh}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hey man im josh (talk) 15:44, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of awards and nominations received by Bad Bunny, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake.

(Opt-out instructions.) —DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the “prompt me when entering a blank edit summary” box in your preferences. Thanks! Telenovelafan215 (talk) 16:09, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monika Helgesson. Thank you for your work on Candy Gum. Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

not mentioned in target page

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|MPGuy2824}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

–MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:45, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Rebbeca (film). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the “Submit your draft for review!” button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Frost 14:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Everything or Nothing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:08, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Do You Wanna Be Perfect?, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. ApexParagon (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rebbeca (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:13, 1 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monika Helgesson. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, “Rebbeca“.

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 14:25, 22 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please don’t change the format of dates, as you did to List of Televisa original productions in 2020s. As a general rule, if an article has evolved using predominantly one format, the dates should be left in the format they were originally written in, unless there are reasons for changing it based on strong national ties to the topic. Please also note that Wikipedia does not use ordinal suffixes (e.g., st, nd, th), articles, or leading zeros on dates.

For more information about how dates should be written on Wikipedia, please see this page.

If you have any questions about this, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Enjoy your time on Wikipedia. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 18:14, 7 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ela Velden. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 17:38, 16 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I’m Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of songs recorded by Becky G, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator.
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:48, 30 November 2025 (UTC)[reply]