:Thank you for your comment and advice. I have removed the line as suggested. I have combed through and removed anything I deemed as promotional or inflammatory, but that one slipped through the net. Apart from that line, are there any other parts in which you believe are preventing the article from being accepted? Would it be more helpful to just remove the paranormal section? It is all facts, there are no claims that there are ghosts, just that it has been repeatedly investigated. Many thanks [[User:Mooredoor1986|Mooredoor1986]] ([[User talk:Mooredoor1986#top|talk]]) 12:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for your comment and advice. I have removed the line as suggested. I have combed through and removed anything I deemed as promotional or inflammatory, but that one slipped through the net. Apart from that line, are there any other parts in which you believe are preventing the article from being accepted? Would it be more helpful to just remove the paranormal section? It is all facts, there are no claims that there are ghosts, just that it has been repeatedly investigated. Many thanks [[User:Mooredoor1986|Mooredoor1986]] ([[User talk:Mooredoor1986#top|talk]]) 12:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:The Olde Boars Head Public House|The Olde Boars Head Public House]] (December 13) ==
<div style=”border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: var(–background-color-warning-subtle, #fdf2d5); color: inherit; padding: 0.5em 1em; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;”> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reason left by NeoGaze was:
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission is not adequately supported by [[WP:RS|reliable sources]]. ”Reliable” sources are required so that information can be [[WP:Verifiability|verified]]. If you need help with referencing, please see [[Help:Referencing for beginners|Referencing for beginners]] and [[Wikipedia:Citing sources|Citing sources]].|}}<!–
—
–> The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Subject seems notable enough, and the draft is in a decent enough state, but more citations are needed and there is a case of failed verification, both tagged. Please fix these}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ”after they have been resolved”.
{{clear}}
* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:The Olde Boars Head Public House]] and click on the “Edit” tab at the top of the window.
* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].
* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:The_Olde_Boars_Head_Public_House ”’Articles for creation help desk”’]</span>, on the <span class=”plainlinks” >[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeoGaze&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:The_Olde_Boars_Head_Public_House ”’reviewer’s talk page”’]</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia’s real-time chat help from experienced editors]].
[[User:NeoGaze|NeoGaze]] ([[User talk:NeoGaze|talk]]) 13:48, 13 December 2025 (UTC)</div><!–Template:AfC decline–>
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
|
Hello, Mooredoor1986!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we’d love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk / contribs) 09:45, 22 September 2025 (UTC) |
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Please do not use AI to write parts of articles (looking at the Interior Features section specifically). You need a range of reliable, secondary sources that cover the subject in significant depth and are independent from the subject to establish notability. Twelve different pages from the same source doesn’t really help to establish notability.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thanks for uploading File:Olde Boars Head.png. You don’t seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click “Edit this page” and add the tag to the image’s description. If there doesn’t seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. —ImageTaggingBot (talk) 11:30, 16 October 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:
Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
- Thank you for your comment and advice. I have removed the line as suggested. I have combed through and removed anything I deemed as promotional or inflammatory, but that one slipped through the net. Apart from that line, are there any other parts in which you believe are preventing the article from being accepted? Would it be more helpful to just remove the paranormal section? It is all facts, there are no claims that there are ghosts, just that it has been repeatedly investigated. Many thanks Mooredoor1986 (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2025 (UTC)
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NeoGaze was: The comment the reviewer left was:
Subject seems notable enough, and the draft is in a decent enough state, but more citations are needed and there is a case of failed verification, both tagged. Please fix these
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
